Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2400
and
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 7 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (3210 MHz vs 2500 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: December 2024 (January 2024 vs December 2024)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
HiSilicon
January 2024
Launch Date
December 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
SMIC
Exynos 2400
Model Name
Kirin 9020
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 2.5 GHz – TaiShan
3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan
4x 1.6 GHz – TaiShan
3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan
4x 1.6 GHz – TaiShan
10
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
7 nm
3210 MHz
Frequency
2500 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU name
Maleoon 920
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
840 MHz
-
Execution units
4
-
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
2750 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Da Vinci
-
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
L3 cache
10 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
-
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
8K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2400
2080
+26%
Kirin 9020
1648
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2400
6582
+21%
Kirin 9020
5420
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2400
1698761
+37%
Kirin 9020
1236035
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
Huawei Pura 80 Pro+ / Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
452
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2025)
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
10517
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2400-vs-hisilicon-kirin-9020" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2400 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9020</a>