Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2400
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (3210 MHz vs 3050 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (January 2024 vs November 2022)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
January 2024
Launch Date
November 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Exynos 2400
Model Name
MT6985
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X3
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
10
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3210 MHz
Frequency
3050 MHz
-
Transistor count
17
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU name
Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
1000 MHz
-
FLOPS
3.5904 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
192
-
Execution units
11
-
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
Connectivity
Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7900 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.3
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
4266 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
3.5
-
L3 cache
8 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
8K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 690
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2400
2080
+7%
Dimensity 9200
1949
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2400
6582
+24%
Dimensity 9200
5301
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2400
1698761
+37%
Dimensity 9200
1240205
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
Vivo X90
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
13645
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
Vivo X90
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
15351
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
Vivo X90
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
5578
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
Vivo X90
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
461
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
Vivo X90
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
5711
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
Vivo X90
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
1357
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
12376
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
Vivo X90
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
3597
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
14934
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
12714
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2400-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9200" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200</a>