Google Tensor
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Google Tensor
and
Samsung Exynos 2400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (2800 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (October 2021 vs January 2024)
Basic
Google
Label Name
Samsung
October 2021
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E9845
Model Name
Exynos 2400
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G78 MP20
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
848 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
2.1709 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
64
Shading units
-
20
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
-
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 7350 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
5.6 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Tensor Processing Unit
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Tensor
1319
Exynos 2400
2080
+58%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Tensor
3234
Exynos 2400
6582
+104%
AnTuTu 10
Tensor
813782
Exynos 2400
1698761
+109%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor
7766
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor
9005
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor
703
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor
653
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1865
3DMark Wild Life
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor
6379
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 6
Google Tensor
1907
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor
6731
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
14934
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor
28287
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Google Pixel 6 Pro
Google Tensor
11930
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/google-tensor-vs-samsung-exynos-2400" target="_blank">Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 2400</a>