Apple A14 Bionic
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Apple A14 Bionic and Samsung Exynos 2400 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (3100 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (September 2020 vs January 2024)

Basic

Apple
Label Name
Samsung
September 2020
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
APL1W01
Model Name
Exynos 2400
2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
6
Cores
10
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
3100 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
11.8
Transistor count
-

GPU Specifications

Apple A14 GPU
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
1278 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
0.6543 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
64
Shading units
-
4
Execution units
-
2732 x 2048
Max display resolution
-

Connectivity

Up to 7500 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.0
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

8 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
NVMe
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
6 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.5-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Neural Engine
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
A14 Bionic
2087 +0%
Exynos 2400
2080
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
A14 Bionic
4820
Exynos 2400
6582 +37%
AnTuTu 10
A14 Bionic
1082930
Exynos 2400
1698761 +57%