Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and Samsung Exynos 2400 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 3 nm (3 nm vs 4 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 4600 MHz / 4740 MHz (4600 MHz / 4740 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: September 2025 (September 2025 vs January 2024)

Basic

Qualcomm
Label Name
Samsung
September 2025
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
SM8850-AC/SM8850-5-AC
Model Name
Exynos 2400
2x 4.6 GHz, 6x 3.62 GHz
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
3 nm
Technology
4 nm
4600 MHz / 4740 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz

GPU Specifications

Adreno 840
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
3.6864 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
512
Shading units
-
3.0 FP
OpenCL version
-
On-Device Display Support • 4K+ @ 120Hz • QHD+ @ 240Hz
Max display resolution
-

Connectivity

-
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
X85 5G Modem-RF System
5G support
Yes
6.0
Bluetooth
5.4
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
up to 5300MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

24 MB
L2 Cache
-
8 MB
L3 cache
-
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 4.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K video capture @120FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP8 - VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K HDR video playback @60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Hexagon
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3757 +81%
Exynos 2400
2080
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
12644 +92%
Exynos 2400
6582
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3269240 +92%
Exynos 2400
1698761

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Solar Bay
Redmagic 11 Pro / 11 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
13959
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
1443
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Honor Win
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
1317
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
895
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Redmagic 11 Pro / 11 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
14509
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
ZTE Nubia Z80 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3157
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Honor Magic8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
3043
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1865
3DMark Wild Life
Realme GT8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
22090
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
6031
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Xiaomi 17
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
189969
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro / 11 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
27852
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419