HiSilicon Kirin 9000
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
and
Samsung Exynos 2400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (3130 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (October 2020 vs January 2024)
Basic
HiSilicon
Label Name
Samsung
October 2020
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Kirin 9000
Model Name
Exynos 2400
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
3130 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
15.3
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-G78 MP24
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
759 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
2.3316 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
64
Shading units
-
24
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
-
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 4600 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
2750 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
6 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
AI accelerator
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Kirin 9000
1266
Exynos 2400
2080
+64%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Kirin 9000
3529
Exynos 2400
6582
+87%
AnTuTu 10
Kirin 9000
925940
Exynos 2400
1698761
+83%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6410
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Huawei Mate X2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
621
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
3DMark Wild Life
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6072
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
2060
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6774
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
14934
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
39858
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
9262
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/hisilicon-kirin-9000-vs-samsung-exynos-2400" target="_blank">HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 2400</a>