Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
Samsung Exynos 1330
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2400
and
Samsung Exynos 1330
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 5 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (3210 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (January 2024 vs February 2023)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Samsung
January 2024
Launch Date
February 2023
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
Exynos 2400
Model Name
S5E8535
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
10
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
5 nm
3210 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU name
Mali-G68 MP2
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
950 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.24 TFLOPS
-
Execution units
2
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
-
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
Connectivity
Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 2550 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
7
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
8K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
-
TDP
7 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2400
2080
+137%
Exynos 1330
879
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2400
6582
+246%
Exynos 1330
1900
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2400
1698761
+306%
Exynos 1330
418574
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (Exynos 1330)
Samsung Exynos 1330
2521
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (Exynos 1330)
Samsung Exynos 1330
3593
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (Exynos 1330)
Samsung Exynos 1330
139
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
Samsung Galaxy A17
Samsung Exynos 1330
21451
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Samsung Galaxy A17
Samsung Exynos 1330
12383
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2400-vs-samsung-exynos-1330" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Samsung Exynos 1330</a>