MediaTek Dimensity 9300
vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
and
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 5 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3250 MHz (3250 MHz vs 3130 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: November 2023 (November 2023 vs October 2020)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
HiSilicon
November 2023
Launch Date
October 2020
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Dimensity 9300
Model Name
Kirin 9000
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
Architecture
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
5 nm
3250 MHz
Frequency
3130 MHz
22.7
Transistor count
15.3
GPU Specifications
Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
GPU name
Mali-G78 MP24
1300 MHz
GPU frequency
759 MHz
5.9904 TFLOPS
FLOPS
2.3316 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
64
-
Execution units
24
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4600 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5T
Memory type
LPDDR5
9600 MHz
Memory frequency
2750 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
3.5
L2 Cache
-
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
-
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
-
TDP
6 W
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
AI accelerator
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 9300
2225
+76%
Kirin 9000
1266
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 9300
7857
+123%
Kirin 9000
3529
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 9300
6110
+157%
Kirin 9000
2378
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 9300
2032141
+119%
Kirin 9000
925940
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
19049
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6410
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
1884
Huawei Mate X2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
621
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
16337
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6072
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
4724
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
2060
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Vivo X100
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
18317
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6774
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Vivo X100 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
45132
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
39858
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Vivo Pad 3 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
14205
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
9262
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-9300-vs-hisilicon-kirin-9000" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000</a>