Samsung Exynos 1480
vs
Samsung Exynos 9825
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1480
and
Samsung Exynos 9825
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 7 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2750 MHz (2750 MHz vs 2730 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2024 (March 2024 vs August 2019)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Samsung
March 2024
Launch Date
August 2019
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
Exynos 1480
Model Name
S5E9825
4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 2.73 GHz – M4
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
7 nm
2750 MHz
Frequency
2730 MHz
-
Transistor count
8.5
GPU Specifications
-
GPU name
Mali-G76 MP12
1300 MHz
GPU frequency
754 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.6515 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
36
-
Execution units
12
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
3840 x 2400
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 2000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 20
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.0
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 32MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
-
TDP
9 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1480
1158
+72%
Exynos 9825
674
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1480
3485
+47%
Exynos 9825
2377
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1480
720068
+6%
Exynos 9825
679606
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
7999
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
4714
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
6066
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5160
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
4048
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5018
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
6799
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5690
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
8928
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
4951
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy A37
Samsung Exynos 1480
481
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
393
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
467
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
399
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
3900
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
3404
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A37
Samsung Exynos 1480
1021
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
1107
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A37
Samsung Exynos 1480
3964
Samsung Galaxy M62
Samsung Exynos 9825
3484
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
17597
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
21775
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
13186
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
9318
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A37
Samsung Exynos 1480
982
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
1108
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1480-vs-samsung-exynos-9825" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1480 vs Samsung Exynos 9825</a>