Samsung Exynos 9825
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 9825
and
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2730 MHz (2730 MHz vs 2600 MHz)
- Higher Technology: 6 nm (7 nm vs 6 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: May 2023 (August 2019 vs May 2023)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
August 2019
Launch Date
May 2023
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E9825
Model Name
MT6877 MT6877V/TTZA
2x 2.73 GHz – M4
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
7 nm
Technology
6 nm
2730 MHz
Frequency
2600 MHz
8.5
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-G76 MP12
GPU name
Mali-G68 MP4
754 MHz
GPU frequency
800 MHz
0.6515 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.686 TFLOPS
36
Shading units
-
12
Execution units
4
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2400
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 2000 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 2770 Mbps
LTE Cat. 20
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.0
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 32MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
9 W
TDP
4 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 550
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 9825
674
Dimensity 7050
962
+43%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 9825
2377
+1%
Dimensity 7050
2364
FP32 (float)
Exynos 9825
664
Dimensity 7050
700
+5%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 9825
679606
+24%
Dimensity 7050
545975
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
4714
NUU Mobile B30 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
5483
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5160
NUU Mobile B30 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
4338
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5018
Realme Narzo 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
3927
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5690
Realme 12+
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
4301
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
4951
Realme Narzo 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
5413
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
393
Oukitel WP300
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
272
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
3404
Lava Agni 2
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
2304
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
21775
Oukitel WP300
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
101528
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
9318
Lava Agni 2
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
14835
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-9825-vs-mediatek-dimensity-7050" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050</a>