Samsung Exynos 9825
vs
MediaTek Helio G99
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 9825
and
MediaTek Helio G99
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2730 MHz (2730 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
- Higher Technology: 6 nm (7 nm vs 6 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: May 2022 (August 2019 vs May 2022)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
August 2019
Launch Date
May 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E9825
Model Name
MT6789
2x 2.73 GHz – M4
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
7 nm
Technology
6 nm
2730 MHz
Frequency
2200 MHz
8.5
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-G76 MP12
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP2
754 MHz
GPU frequency
1100 MHz
0.6515 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.2816 TFLOPS
36
Shading units
64
12
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2400
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 2000 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 650 Mbps
LTE Cat. 20
4G support
LTE Cat. 13
Yes
5G support
No
5.0
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 32MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Storage type
UFS 2.2
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
2K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
2K at 30FPS
9 W
TDP
5 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 9825
674
Helio G99
733
+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 9825
2377
+19%
Helio G99
1994
FP32 (float)
Exynos 9825
664
+141%
Helio G99
275
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 9825
679606
+60%
Helio G99
423470
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
4714
Infinix Xpad
MediaTek Helio G99
3657
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5160
Unihertz 8849 Tank 2 Pro
MediaTek Helio G99
2780
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5018
Realme 11 4G
MediaTek Helio G99
2626
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5690
Realme 10
MediaTek Helio G99
2784
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
4951
Motorola Moto G72
MediaTek Helio G99
3787
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
393
Infinix Zero 30 4G
MediaTek Helio G99
147
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
3404
Oppo Reno8 T
MediaTek Helio G99
1366
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
1107
Oppo Reno8 T
MediaTek Helio G99
378
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy M62
Samsung Exynos 9825
3484
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
MediaTek Helio G99
1222
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
21775
Cubot King Kong Power 3
MediaTek Helio G99
30934
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
9318
Lenovo Tab Plus
MediaTek Helio G99
11879
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
1108
Realme 10
MediaTek Helio G99
366
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-9825-vs-mediatek-helio-g99" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MediaTek Helio G99</a>