Samsung Exynos 9825
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 9825
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2730 MHz (2730 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (7 nm vs 4 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: September 2022 (August 2019 vs September 2022)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Qualcomm
August 2019
Launch Date
September 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E9825
Model Name
SM6450
2x 2.73 GHz – M4
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
7 nm
Technology
4 nm
2730 MHz
Frequency
2200 MHz
8.5
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-G76 MP12
GPU name
Adreno 710
754 MHz
GPU frequency
-
0.6515 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
36
Shading units
-
12
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2400
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 20
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.0
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
2750 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 32MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Storage type
UFS 2.2
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
9 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 9825
674
Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
946
+40%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 9825
2377
Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
2750
+16%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 9825
679606
+14%
Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
594398
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
4714
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
5585
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5160
Oppo Reno13 F 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
4096
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5018
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
3666
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5690
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
4524
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
4951
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
5788
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
393
Oppo Reno14 F
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
244
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
3404
Honor X50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
2391
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
1107
Honor X50
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
614
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
21775
Oppo Reno14 F
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
64431
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
9318
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
13818
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-9825-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-6-gen-1" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1</a>