Unisoc T760
vs
Samsung Exynos 9825
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Unisoc T760
and
Samsung Exynos 9825
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 6 nm (6 nm vs 7 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: July 2024 (July 2024 vs August 2019)
- Higher Frequency: 2730 MHz (2200 MHz vs 2730 MHz)
Basic
Unisoc
Label Name
Samsung
July 2024
Launch Date
August 2019
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
T760
Model Name
S5E9825
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 2.73 GHz – M4
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
7 nm
2200 MHz
Frequency
2730 MHz
-
Transistor count
8.5
GPU Specifications
Mali-G57 MP4
GPU name
Mali-G76 MP12
650 MHz
GPU frequency
754 MHz
0.3072 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.6515 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
36
-
Execution units
12
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
-
Max display resolution
3840 x 2400
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 2000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 15
4G support
LTE Cat. 20
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.0
Bluetooth
5.0
5
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 108MP
Max camera resolution
1x 32MP, 2x 16MP
eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
-
TDP
9 W
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
T760
759
+13%
Exynos 9825
674
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
T760
2438
+3%
Exynos 9825
2377
FP32 (float)
T760
313
Exynos 9825
664
+112%
AnTuTu 10
T760
459193
Exynos 9825
679606
+48%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T760
4229
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
4714
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T760
3202
Samsung Galaxy Note 10 (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5160
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T760
3013
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
5018
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T760
172
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
393
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
ZTE Nubia Focus Pro
Unisoc T760
31837
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
21775
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T760
12083
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
9318
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/unisoc-t760-vs-samsung-exynos-9825" target="_blank">Unisoc T760 vs Samsung Exynos 9825</a>