Samsung Exynos 1380
vs
MediaTek Helio G200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1380
and
MediaTek Helio G200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 5 nm (5 nm vs 6 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2400 MHz (2400 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: May 2025 (February 2023 vs May 2025)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
February 2023
Launch Date
May 2025
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E8835
Model Name
Helio G200
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76, 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
6 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
2200 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G68 MP5
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP2
950 MHz
GPU frequency
1100 MHz
0.608 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.1408 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
32
5
Execution units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 3790 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 650 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 13
Yes
5G support
No
5.3
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.2
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1380
1008
+34%
Helio G200
755
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1380
2773
+36%
Helio G200
2038
FP32 (float)
Exynos 1380
620
+353%
Helio G200
137
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1380
578941
+33%
Helio G200
435929
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
5860
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
3564
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
4729
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
2760
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
295
Infinix Hot 60 Pro+
MediaTek Helio G200
147
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy M54
Samsung Exynos 1380
17460
Infinix Hot 60 Pro
MediaTek Helio G200
28347
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1380)
Samsung Exynos 1380
13227
Infinix Hot 60 Pro
MediaTek Helio G200
10896
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1380-vs-mediatek-helio-g200" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Helio G200</a>