Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
and
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: December 2020 (December 2020 vs October 2020)
- Higher Frequency: 3130 MHz (2840 MHz vs 3130 MHz)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
HiSilicon
December 2020
Launch Date
October 2020
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
-
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM8350
Model Name
Kirin 9000
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
5 nm
2840 MHz
Frequency
3130 MHz
-
Transistor count
15.3
GPU Specifications
Adreno 660
GPU name
Mali-G78 MP24
840 MHz
GPU frequency
759 MHz
1.72 TFLOPS
FLOPS
2.3316 TFLOPS
512
Shading units
64
2
Execution units
24
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 22
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
-
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2750 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
Hexagon 780
Neural processor (NPU)
AI accelerator
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Max camera resolution
-
UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
8K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
10 W
TDP
6 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 888
1481
+17%
Kirin 9000
1266
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 888
3794
+8%
Kirin 9000
3529
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 888
1754
Kirin 9000
2378
+36%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
8231
Huawei Mate X2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
7880
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
9612
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6410
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Lenovo Legion Phone Dual 2 / 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
529
Huawei Mate X2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
621
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6072
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
1548
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
2060
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Oppo Find N
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
5890
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
6774
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
38350
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
39858
PCMark for Android Work 2.0
Vivo iQOO Neo5S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
9485
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
7360
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
16735
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
9262
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
1523
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
2057
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-888-vs-hisilicon-kirin-9000" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000</a>