Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
vs
MediaTek Helio G99
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
and
MediaTek Helio G99
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2500 MHz (2500 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: May 2022 (October 2021 vs May 2022)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
MediaTek
October 2021
Launch Date
May 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM7325-AE
Model Name
MT6789
1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
6 nm
2500 MHz
Frequency
2200 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 642
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP2
550 MHz
GPU frequency
1100 MHz
0.8448 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.2816 TFLOPS
384
Shading units
64
2
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12.1
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 3700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 650 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 13
Yes
5G support
No
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 192MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.2
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
2K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
2K at 30FPS
5 W
TDP
5 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Hexagon 770
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 778G Plus
1069
+46%
Helio G99
733
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 778G Plus
3008
+51%
Helio G99
1994
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 778G Plus
861
+213%
Helio G99
275
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 778G Plus
604344
+43%
Helio G99
423470
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
6909
Infinix Xpad
MediaTek Helio G99
3657
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5463
Unihertz 8849 Tank 2 Pro
MediaTek Helio G99
2780
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
4439
Realme 11 4G
MediaTek Helio G99
2626
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5656
Realme 10
MediaTek Helio G99
2784
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
7383
Motorola Moto G72
MediaTek Helio G99
3787
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
250
Infinix Zero 30 4G
MediaTek Helio G99
147
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2799
Oppo Reno8 T
MediaTek Helio G99
1366
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
768
Oppo Reno8 T
MediaTek Helio G99
378
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2642
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
MediaTek Helio G99
1222
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Xiaomi Civi 1S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
22519
Cubot King Kong Power 3
MediaTek Helio G99
30934
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
12441
Lenovo Tab Plus
MediaTek Helio G99
11879
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-778g-plus-vs-mediatek-helio-g99" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs MediaTek Helio G99</a>