Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
vs
Unisoc T606
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
and
Unisoc T606
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 6 nm (6 nm vs 12 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2500 MHz (2500 MHz vs 1600 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: October 2021 (October 2021 vs September 2021)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
Unisoc
October 2021
Launch Date
September 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Low end
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM7325-AE
Model Name
T606
1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A756x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
12 nm
2500 MHz
Frequency
1600 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 642
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
550 MHz
GPU frequency
650 MHz
0.8448 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0832 TFLOPS
384
Shading units
64
2
Execution units
1
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
12.1
DirectX version
11
Connectivity
Up to 3700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
Yes
5G support
No
5.2
Bluetooth
5.0
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
1600 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 192MP
Max camera resolution
1x 24MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0, UFS 2.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.1-A
Hexagon 770
Neural processor (NPU)
No
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 778G Plus
1069
+187%
T606
372
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 778G Plus
3008
+115%
T606
1397
FP32 (float)
Snapdragon 778G Plus
861
+963%
T606
81
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 778G Plus
604344
+131%
T606
261381
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
6909
ZTE Nubia V70 Design
Unisoc T606
1479
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5463
ZTE Nubia V70 Design
Unisoc T606
982
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
4439
Blackview Tab 60 Pro
Unisoc T606
984
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5656
Motorola Moto E13
Unisoc T606
1667
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
7383
Motorola Moto E13
Unisoc T606
1503
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
250
Blackview Tab 60 Pro
Unisoc T606
51
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo iQOO Z6 (SDM778G+)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2799
UleFone Note 16 Pro
Unisoc T606
425
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Xiaomi Civi 1S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
22519
Doogee Blade 10 Ultra
Unisoc T606
23224
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Honor 70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
12441
Doogee Blade 10 Ultra
Unisoc T606
8505
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-778g-plus-vs-unisoc-t606" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Unisoc T606</a>