MediaTek Helio G99
vs
Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Helio G99
and
Samsung Exynos 2200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: May 2022 (May 2022 vs January 2022)
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (6 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2800 MHz (2200 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
May 2022
Launch Date
January 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
MT6789
Model Name
S5E9925
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
4 nm
2200 MHz
Frequency
2800 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G57 MP2
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
1100 MHz
GPU frequency
810 MHz
0.2816 TFLOPS
FLOPS
3.1104 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
640
2
Execution units
3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 650 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
LTE Cat. 13
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
No
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
5
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 2.2
Storage type
UFS 3.1
2K at 30FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
2K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
5 W
TDP
7 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Helio G99
733
Exynos 2200
1594
+117%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Helio G99
1994
Exynos 2200
3685
+85%
FP32 (float)
Helio G99
275
Exynos 2200
3172
+1053%
AnTuTu 10
Helio G99
423470
Exynos 2200
902026
+113%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Realme 10
MediaTek Helio G99
2784
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Motorola Moto G72
MediaTek Helio G99
3787
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Infinix Zero 30 4G
MediaTek Helio G99
147
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Reno8 T
MediaTek Helio G99
1366
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
8152
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Reno8 T
MediaTek Helio G99
378
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1967
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
MediaTek Helio G99
1222
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
7940
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Cubot King Kong Power 3
MediaTek Helio G99
30934
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Lenovo Tab Plus
MediaTek Helio G99
11879
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme 10
MediaTek Helio G99
366
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1958
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-helio-g99-vs-samsung-exynos-2200" target="_blank">MediaTek Helio G99 vs Samsung Exynos 2200</a>