Samsung Exynos 2200
vs
Google Tensor G2
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2200
and
Google Tensor G2
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 5 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2850 MHz (2800 MHz vs 2850 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: October 2022 (January 2022 vs October 2022)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Google
January 2022
Launch Date
October 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E9925
Model Name
Tensor G2
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
5 nm
2800 MHz
Frequency
2850 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU name
Mali-G710 MP7
810 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
3.1104 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.1424 TFLOPS
640
Shading units
96
3
Execution units
7
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.1
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 7350 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7350 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
7 W
TDP
7 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2200
1594
+34%
Tensor G2
1188
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2200
3685
+6%
Tensor G2
3468
FP32 (float)
Exynos 2200
3172
+183%
Tensor G2
1119
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2200
902026
+9%
Tensor G2
824434
AntuTu 11
Exynos 2200
1434169
+21%
Tensor G2
1186373
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
10205
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
8943
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
12295
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
10611
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
995
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
723
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1042
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
725
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
8152
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
6526
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1967
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
1841
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
7940
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
6726
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
32965
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
32023
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
13499
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2
11827
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos 2200)
Samsung Exynos 2200
1958
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
1768
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2200-vs-google-tensor-g2" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Google Tensor G2</a>