MediaTek Dimensity 9500
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5

vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 mobile chipset comparison

SoC Comparison Result

MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 5: flagship vs mid-range

Dimensity 9500 and Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 belong to different classes. The Dimensity 9500 is used in flagship devices like the vivo X300 and OPPO Find X9, while the Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 can be found in mid-range models such as the Honor X80 Pro Max and Redmi Note 17 Pro Max. In AnTuTu 11 benchmarks, smartphones with Dimensity score more than three times higher, and in 3DMark, the advantage can reach about five times in the best pass.

Key Differences

Characteristic MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5
Class Flagship Mid-range
Process Technology TSMC N3P, 3 nm 4 nm
CPU 1x C1-Ultra 4.21 GHz + 3x C1-Premium 3.5 GHz + 4x C1-Pro 2.7 GHz Kryo, 4 performance cores up to 2.6 GHz + 4 efficiency cores up to 2.0 GHz
GPU Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 Adreno
RAM LPDDR5X LPDDR5 / LPDDR4X
Storage UFS 4.1, 4 lanes UFS 3.1
Maximum Display WQHD+ 180 Hz FHD+ 144 Hz
Camera Up to 320 MP Up to 200 MP
Video Recording 8K 60 FPS, 4K 120 FPS with EIS 4K 30 FPS
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 7 Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0

The Dimensity 9500 is built on the third generation of MediaTek's All Big Core architecture. Its configuration includes C1-Ultra, C1-Premium, and C1-Pro cores, with the top core running at a frequency of up to 4.21 GHz. The chip is manufactured on TSMC's 3nm N3P process and supports four-lane UFS 4.1 storage.

The Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 utilizes a Kryo configuration with four performance and four efficiency cores, with a maximum frequency of 2.6 GHz. Qualcomm does not officially disclose the specific names of the ARM cores.

The Dimensity 9500 also supports faster storage, higher resolution displays, and advanced video recording. MediaTek claims support for WQHD+ up to 180 Hz, sensors up to 320 MP, 8K 60 FPS, and 4K 120 FPS with EIS. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 supports FHD+ at 144 Hz, cameras up to 200 MP, 4K 30 FPS, and UFS 3.1. In terms of wireless connectivity, both chips support Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6.0.

Real-World Smartphone Performance

The table includes four commercial smartphones-two on each platform.

Smartphone Processor AnTuTu 11 Geekbench 6 Single Geekbench 6 Multi
vivo X300 Dimensity 9500 3,330,801 3,204 9,874
OPPO Find X9 Dimensity 9500 3,400,423 3,107 9,557
Honor X80 Pro Max Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 1,012,134 1,177 3,498
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 1,010,104 1,099 3,481

The AnTuTu 11 result for the vivo X300 is based on 25 published user tests, and for the OPPO Find X9, it is based on seven. These results already reflect the typical performance range of smartphones running on Dimensity 9500.

Less data is currently available for Snapdragon 6 Gen 5. Only one user result is published for the Honor X80 Pro Max in AnTuTu 11, and there are currently no user runs for the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max, although the device's final score is specified. Therefore, the results for Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 should be regarded as preliminary benchmarks.

The average results for the two devices on each platform are as follows:

Test Dimensity 9500 Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 Difference
AnTuTu 11 3,365,612 1,011,119 3.33 times
Geekbench 6 Single 3,156 1,138 2.77 times
Geekbench 6 Multi 9,716 3,490 2.78 times

The difference is so significant that firmware and cooling characteristics do not change the overall picture. In Geekbench 6, smartphones on Dimensity score approximately 2.8 times higher, while in AnTuTu 11, it's more than three times.

Graphics and 3DMark

Graphics performance is comparable in the 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test.

Smartphone Best Pass Worst Pass Stability
vivo X300 6,154 2,772 45.0%
OPPO Find X9 6,996 3,657 52.3%
Honor X80 Pro Max 1,214 1,210 99.7%

The best pass of the vivo X300 is about 5.1 times higher than the result of the Honor X80 Pro Max. For the OPPO Find X9, the advantage reaches around 5.8 times.

Under prolonged load, the Dimensity advantage decreases due to throttling. In the worst pass, the vivo X300 scores 2,772 points, and the OPPO Find X9 scores 3,657. The results for the Honor X80 Pro Max remain nearly unchanged: 1,214 points in the best pass and 1,210 in the worst.

However, the high stability of the Snapdragon does not imply high speed. Even the worst result of the vivo X300 is about 2.3 times higher than the result of the Honor. The OPPO Find X9's results remain about three times higher.

The results of the Dimensity 9500 are significantly more dependent on the smartphone's cooling. In contrast, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 is slower but almost does not lose speed in this stress test.

Smartphone Prices

The difference in speed should be considered alongside the price of the devices. The minimum prices found as of early September 2026 are:

Smartphone Processor Estimated Price
vivo X300 12/256 GB, China Dimensity 9500 from $591
OPPO Find X9 12/256 GB, China Dimensity 9500 from $715
Honor X80 Pro Max 8/256 GB, China Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 from $415
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 8/256 GB, Malaysia Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 around $494

The vivo X300 is more expensive than the Honor X80 Pro Max, but the price difference is much smaller than the speed difference.

The official price of the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 8/256 GB in Malaysia is 1,999 ringgits, equivalent to approximately $494 based on the exchange rate as of September 5, 2026.

These prices relate to different markets, so it is not possible to directly compare the price-performance ratio using this table. However, the price gap is significantly smaller than what the tests indicate.

What Will Be Noticeable in Everyday Use

For browsing, messaging, navigation, social media, and video, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 provides adequate power without problems. In these tasks, differences will be noticeably smaller than what synthetic tests show.

The differences become more apparent in gaming, photo and video processing, and simultaneous use with heavy applications.

The Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 is designed for moderate graphics settings, while the Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 can handle significantly heavier loads and supports hardware ray tracing. MediaTek claims a GPU performance improvement of up to 33% and ray tracing performance improvement of up to 119% compared to the previous generation.

In gaming, the outcome also depends on cooling, memory, power limits, and the specific firmware of the smartphone.

Cameras and Multimedia

The Dimensity 9500 supports cameras up to 320 MP, 8K 60 FPS recording, and 4K 120 FPS with electronic stabilization. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 supports cameras up to 200 MP and 4K 30 FPS recording.

These numbers alone do not determine the quality of photos. Factors such as sensors, optics, and manufacturer algorithms have a greater influence. These specifications show the limits of the platform itself and not the quality of a specific smartphone's camera.

Conclusion

The comparison is initially uneven in class. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 was released later but is intended for mid-range smartphones, whereas the Dimensity 9500 was designed for flagships.

According to specific device benchmarks, smartphones on the Dimensity 9500 score approximately 2.8 times higher in Geekbench 6 and more than three times higher in AnTuTu 11. In 3DMark, the best results for Dimensity devices are roughly five times higher. Even after significant throttling, they remain noticeably faster.

In the tested Honor, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 nearly retains performance under prolonged load. The chip also supports Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6.0.

The main argument for the Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 is the lower price of the smartphone, rather than a more recent chip release date.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 3 nm (3 nm vs 4 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 4210 (4210 vs 2.6 GHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: May 2026 (September 2025 vs May 2026)

Basic

MediaTek
Label Name
Qualcomm
September 2025
Launch Date
May 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
-
-
Model Name
Snapdragon 6 Gen 5
1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra, 3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium, 4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
Architecture
4x 2.6 GHz - Kryo Performance; 4x 2.0 GHz - Kryo Efficiency
8
Cores
8
3 nm
Technology
4 nm
4210
Frequency
2.6 GHz

GPU Specifications

GPU Arm Mali-G1 Ultra MC12
GPU name
Qualcomm Adreno GPU
1750 MHz
GPU frequency
-
128
Shading units
-
-
OpenCL version
OpenCL 2.0 FP
-
Vulkan version
Vulkan 1.3
WQHD+ 180Hz
Max display resolution
FHD+ at 144 Hz

Connectivity

Yes
4G support
5G/4G DSDA
Yes
5G support
Sub-6 GHz 5G; SA and NSA; TDD and FDD; TDD-FDD aggregation; DSS; 140 MHz bandwidth; downlink up to 2.8 Gbps; Release 17
6.0
Bluetooth
Bluetooth 6.0; LE Audio; Bluetooth Channel Sounding
7
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 7; 802.11be, 802.11ax, 802.11ac, 802.11a/b/g/n; up to 5.8 Gbps; up to 320 MHz channels
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC; dual-frequency GNSS L1 + L5

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5X
Memory type
LP-DDR4x, LP-DDR5
5333 MHz
Memory frequency
LP-DDR4x: 2100 MHz; LP-DDR5: 3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
-

Miscellaneous

2MB/1MB/512KB
L2 Cache
-
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
Audio codecs
Qualcomm Aqstic audio codec; Qualcomm Aqstic smart speaker amplifier; Snapdragon Sound; Qualcomm XPAN
320 MP
Max camera resolution
200 MP; 64 MP single camera with ZSL; 16 MP + 16 MP dual camera with ZSL
-
Storage type
UFS 3.1
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K HDR video capture at 30 FPS; 720p slow-motion video capture at 240 FPS; HEVC and H.264 video capture
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, HEVC, VP9, HLG
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
Hardware-accelerated H.265 and VP9 decoder; HLG HDR playback
ARMv9.3
Instruction set
64-bit
MediaTek NPU 990
Neural processor (NPU)
-

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 9500
4007 +240%
Snapdragon 6 Gen 5
1180
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 9500
11217 +220%
Snapdragon 6 Gen 5
3501