Samsung Exynos 2500
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2500
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 4210 (3200 MHz vs 4210)
- Newer Launch Date: September 2025 (January 2025 vs September 2025)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
January 2025
Launch Date
September 2025
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Exynos 2500
Model Name
-
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra, 3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium, 4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
10
Cores
8
3 nm
Technology
3 nm
3200 MHz
Frequency
4210
GPU Specifications
-
GPU name
GPU Arm Mali-G1 Ultra MC12
-
GPU frequency
1750 MHz
-
Shading units
128
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
WQHD+ 180Hz
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
Yes
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
6.0
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5T
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
5333 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
2MB/1MB/512KB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
-
Max camera resolution
320 MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
-
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.3
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek NPU 990
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2500
2719
Dimensity 9500
4007
+47%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2500
9016
Dimensity 9500
11217
+24%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2500
2570180
Dimensity 9500
4011932
+56%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
25095
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
22918
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
9365
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
14221
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
1160
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
1357
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
1200
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
912
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
10736
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
12247
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2233
Oppo Find X9
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
3423
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2342
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
3072
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
37192
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
94857
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
16072
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
16431
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2500-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9500" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500</a>