Samsung Exynos 2500
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2500
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 4210 (3200 MHz vs 4210)
- Newer Launch Date: September 2025 (January 2025 vs September 2025)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
January 2025
Launch Date
September 2025
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Exynos 2500
Model Name
-
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra, 3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium, 4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
10
Cores
8
3 nm
Technology
3 nm
3200 MHz
Frequency
4210
GPU Specifications
-
GPU name
GPU Arm Mali-G1 Ultra MC12
-
GPU frequency
1750 MHz
-
Shading units
128
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
WQHD+ 180Hz
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
Yes
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
6.0
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5T
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
5333 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
2MB/1MB/512KB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
-
Max camera resolution
320 MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
-
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.3
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek NPU 990
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2500
2719
Dimensity 9500
4007
+47%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2500
9016
Dimensity 9500
11217
+24%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2500
2570180
Dimensity 9500
4011932
+56%
AntuTu 11
Exynos 2500
2289696
Dimensity 9500
3760662
+64%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
25095
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
22918
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Samsung Exynos 2500
10527
OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
15142
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Samsung Exynos 2500
1303
OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
1381
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
1200
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
912
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
10736
Vivo X300s
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
15176
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Samsung Exynos 2500
2267
Oppo Find X9
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
3423
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2342
Vivo X300
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
3072
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
37192
Oppo Find X9 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
94857
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
16072
Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
16431
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2500-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9500" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2500 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500</a>