MediaTek Dimensity 6400
vs
Samsung Exynos 2500
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 6400
and
Samsung Exynos 2500
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: February 2025 (February 2025 vs January 2025)
- Higher Technology: 3 nm (6 nm vs 3 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3200 MHz (2500 MHz vs 3200 MHz)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
February 2025
Launch Date
January 2025
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Dimensity 6400
Model Name
Exynos 2500
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
6 nm
Technology
3 nm
2500 MHz
Frequency
3200 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G57 MP2
GPU name
-
64
Shading units
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 3300 Mbps
Download speed
-
-
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.4
5
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5T
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
4800 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
1 MB
L2 Cache
-
2 MB
L3 cache
-
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
-
UFS 2.2
Storage type
UFS 4.0
2K at 30FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1
2K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 6400
819
Exynos 2500
2719
+232%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 6400
2116
Exynos 2500
9016
+326%
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 6400
437112
Exynos 2500
2570180
+488%
AntuTu 11
Dimensity 6400
581041
Exynos 2500
2289696
+294%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Realme 16 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6400
152
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE
Samsung Exynos 2500
2267
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 6400
12164
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
16072
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-6400-vs-samsung-exynos-2500" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs Samsung Exynos 2500</a>