Samsung Exynos 2500
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2500
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 3 nm (3 nm vs 6 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3200 MHz (3200 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2025 (January 2025 vs May 2021)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Qualcomm
January 2025
Launch Date
May 2021
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
-
Exynos 2500
Model Name
SM7325
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
10
Cores
8
3 nm
Technology
6 nm
3200 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
GPU Specifications
-
GPU name
Adreno 642L
-
GPU frequency
490 MHz
-
Shading units
384
-
Execution units
2
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 1200 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
-
5.4
Bluetooth
5.2
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5T
Memory type
LPDDR5
4800 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Max camera resolution
1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
-
TDP
5 W
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 770
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2500
2719
+177%
Snapdragon 778G
981
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2500
9016
+224%
Snapdragon 778G
2787
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2500
2570180
+330%
Snapdragon 778G
597891
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
19059
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5459
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
25095
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6663
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2233
Oppo Reno7 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
234
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2342
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
226
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
37192
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
28872
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
16072
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
13272
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2500-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-778g" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G</a>