Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G: The Perfect Balance for Modern Smartphones

(April 2025)


Introduction

In the world of mobile processors, the balance between performance and energy efficiency is a key parameter. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G, introduced in 2021, remains in demand in the mid-budget segment by 2025. This chip combines modern technologies, 5G support, and sufficient power for most tasks. Let’s explore why it is still relevant and who it is suitable for.


1. Architecture and Process Technology: The Foundation of Stability

Cores and Frequencies

The Snapdragon 778G is built on TSMC's 6nm process technology, ensuring low power consumption (TDP — 5W) and moderate heating. The CPU architecture comprises 8 cores:

- 1× Cortex-A78 at 2.4 GHz for heavy tasks;

- 3× Cortex-A78 @ 2.2 GHz — auxiliary cores for multitasking;

- 4× Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz — for background processes.

This hybrid approach allows for effective load distribution while maintaining smooth interface operation even during intense usage.

GPU Adreno 642L

The Adreno 642L graphics processor supports Vulkan 1.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, and HDR10+. It is optimized for gaming at resolutions up to Full HD+ (1080p) and refresh rates up to 144 Hz.

Cache and Memory

The L2 cache level is 2 MB, which speeds up the processing of frequently used data. It supports LPDDR5 RAM (up to 16 GB) and UFS 3.1 flash storage.


2. Performance in Real Tasks

Gaming

The Adreno 642L handles most games at high settings:

- Genshin Impact — stable 40-50 FPS at 1080p resolution;

- PUBG Mobile — 60 FPS in Ultra HD mode;

- Call of Duty: Mobile — 90 FPS at medium settings.

Important: For games with frame rates above 60 Hz, it is recommended to enable the "Performance" mode and use smartphones with cooling systems (e.g., Xiaomi 12 Lite 2025 Edition).

Multimedia

The chip supports:

- 4K video recording at 30 FPS and 1080p at 120 FPS;

- HDR10+ and Dolby Vision decoding;

- Audio formats aptX Adaptive and Aqstic.

Smartphones with Snapdragon 778G often come with OLED displays at 120 Hz, making content viewing comfortable.

AI Applications

The Hexagon 770 NPU (artificial intelligence) accelerates:

- Photo processing (noise reduction, autofocus);

- Speech recognition (Google Assistant, Siri);

- Video capture modes (stabilization, auto-exposure).

Power Consumption and Heating

Thanks to the 6nm process technology and Android 14 optimization, smartphones with the 778G demonstrate 7-9 hours of active screen time. Even during prolonged gaming sessions, the temperature rarely exceeds 42°C, which prevents throttling.


3. Integrated Modules: The Communication of the Future

Snapdragon X53 5G Modem

- Download speeds: up to 3.3 Gbps (mmWave + Sub-6);

- Support for standalone (SA) and non-standalone (NSA) 5G modes.

Wi-Fi and Bluetooth

- Wi-Fi 6E (up to 3.6 Gbps) with low latency;

- Bluetooth 5.3 with support for LE Audio and Dual Audio.

Navigation

Global support for systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS. Dual-frequency GPS increases positioning accuracy to 1-3 meters.


4. Comparison with Competitors

Snapdragon 7 Gen 2 (2023)

- Advantages: More powerful GPU Adreno 725, support for LPDDR5X;

- Disadvantages: Device prices are 15-20% higher.

MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (2022)

- Similar gaming performance, but poorer AI optimization;

- Lacks Wi-Fi 6E support.

Exynos 1380 (Samsung, 2023)

- Better energy efficiency, but weaker GPU (Mali-G68 MP5).

Conclusion: The Snapdragon 778G retains its position due to stability and affordable device prices ($300-450).


5. Use Scenarios

Gaming

Ideal for casual gaming and streaming. For AAA projects at ultra settings, flagship devices (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) are recommended.

Everyday Tasks

- Instant app launching;

- Smooth browsing and social media experience;

- Support for DeX mode (similar to Samsung DeX for monitor streaming).

Photo and Video

- Processing images up to 200 MP;

- 4K video recording with EIS;

- Modes such as Night Mode, Portrait 2.0.


6. Advantages and Disadvantages

Pros:

- Optimal price-performance ratio;

- Support for modern communication standards;

- Low heating.

Cons:

- Limitations in games with high FPS;

- No hardware support for AV1 decoding.


7. Practical Tips for Choosing a Smartphone

- Cooling: Look for models with vapor chamber cooling (e.g., Realme GT Master Edition 2025).

- Display: AMOLED 120 Hz for gaming and video.

- Battery: At least 4500 mAh for long usage.

- Price: New devices cost $300-500 (Xiaomi, Motorola, Oppo).


8. Final Conclusion: Who Is the Snapdragon 778G For?

This processor is an excellent choice for those who value:

- Reliability — Proven architecture;

- Autonomy — Up to 2 days on moderate usage;

- Future-proofing — Support for 5G and Wi-Fi 6E.

It is ideal for students, travelers, and mobile photography enthusiasts. If you're not ready to pay a premium for top-tier chips but want a modern smartphone without compromises, the Snapdragon 778G is your option.


P.S. In 2025, smartphones with this processor remain popular due to software updates and availability. For example, the Motorola Edge 30 2025 Edition ($349) shows that the "golden mean" will be in demand for a long time.

Basic

Label Name
Qualcomm
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Launch Date
May 2021
Model Name
SM7325
Architecture
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores
8
Technology
6 nm
Frequency
2400 MHz

GPU Specifications

GPU name
Adreno 642L
GPU frequency
490 MHz
Shading units
384
Execution units
2
OpenCL version
2.0
Vulkan version
1.1
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
DirectX version
12

Connectivity

4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Bluetooth
5.2
Wi-Fi
6
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

Memory type
LPDDR5
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 770
L2 Cache
2 MB
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Max camera resolution
1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
TDP
5 W
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
981
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
2787
AnTuTu 10
Score
597891
AiTuTu 3
Score
361114

Phones with Snapdragon 778G

Honor 50
Honor 50
Honor 60
Honor 60
Huawei Hi Nova 9
Huawei Hi Nova 9
Huawei Nova 12S
Huawei Nova 12S
Huawei Nova 9
Huawei Nova 9
Huawei Pocket S
Huawei Pocket S
Motorola Edge (2021)
Motorola Edge (2021)
Motorola Edge 20
Motorola Edge 20
Motorola Edge 5G UW (2021)
Motorola Edge 5G UW (2021)
Oppo Reno7 5G
Oppo Reno7 5G
Realme Q3S
Realme Q3S
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
Xiaomi Civi
Xiaomi Civi
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G

Comparison of Devices with Snapdragon 778G

3DMark Sling Shot
Huawei Nova 12S
6439
Huawei Pocket S
6389
Oppo Reno7 5G
6339
Motorola Edge 20
6335
Realme Q3S
6316
Huawei Hi Nova 9
6299
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
6295
Honor 50
6292
Huawei Nova 9
6283
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
6278
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
6272
Honor 60
6272
Xiaomi Civi
6268
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
6247
Motorola Edge 5G UW (2021)
6228
Motorola Edge (2021)
6210
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
6105
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Huawei Nova 12S
5063
Huawei Pocket S
5051
Huawei Nova 9
5019
Motorola Edge 20
5018
Realme Q3S
5005
Honor 60
5005
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4972
Honor 50
4972
Oppo Reno7 5G
4962
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
4962
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
4958
Huawei Hi Nova 9
4951
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
4946
Motorola Edge 5G UW (2021)
4938
Xiaomi Civi
4937
Motorola Edge (2021)
4933
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
4859
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
4588
Honor 60
4443
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
4309
Honor 50
4288
Motorola Edge 20
4277
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
4270
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
4261
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4260
Huawei Nova 9
4012
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
5459
Motorola Edge 20
5400
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
5363
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
5362
Honor 50
5352
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
5348
Motorola Edge 5G UW (2021)
5276
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
5178
Xiaomi Civi
5176
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
5152
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
6663
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
6646
Motorola Edge 20
6621
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
6620
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
6606
Motorola Edge 5G UW (2021)
6574
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
6256
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
6244
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Oppo Reno7 5G
234
Huawei Pocket S
234
Xiaomi Civi
231
Huawei Hi Nova 9
228
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
226
Motorola Edge 20
226
Motorola Edge 5G UW (2021)
226
Huawei Nova 12S
226
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
225
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
225
Honor 50
225
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
225
Motorola Edge (2021)
225
Realme Q3S
224
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
223
Honor 60
222
Huawei Nova 9
217
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
226
Motorola Edge (2021)
188
3DMark Wild Life
Huawei Nova 9
2490
Honor 50
2486
Huawei Hi Nova 9
2481
Honor 60
2474
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
2473
Motorola Edge 20
2471
Xiaomi Civi
2467
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
2462
Realme Q3S
2459
Oppo Reno7 5G
2458
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
2457
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
2454
Motorola Edge (2021)
2440
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
2439
Motorola Edge 5G UW (2021)
2425
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Huawei Nova 9
693
Xiaomi Civi
690
Honor 50
689
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
688
Motorola Edge 20
688
Honor 60
687
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
686
Oppo Reno7 5G
685
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
685
Realme Q3S
684
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
681
Motorola Edge (2021)
680
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
679
Motorola Edge 5G UW (2021)
678
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
2493
Honor 50
2492
Motorola Edge 20
2486
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
2486
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
2483
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
2482
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
2476
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
2455
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Huawei Nova 12S
28872
Realme Q3S
26827
Motorola Edge 5G UW (2021)
26542
Huawei Nova 9
25921
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
24972
Xiaomi Civi
22800
Motorola Edge (2021)
22510
Motorola Edge 20
22065
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
21925
Honor 60
20815
Honor 50
20118
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
19523
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
19271
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
18573
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 20
13272
Motorola Edge (2021)
13218
Motorola Edge 5G UW (2021)
12638
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
12465
Realme Q3S
12352
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
12290
Honor 50
12282
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
12171
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
12050
Huawei Nova 12S
10934
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
10519
Huawei Nova 9
9618
Xiaomi Civi
9283
Honor 60
8948
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Edge 20
688
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
687
Honor 50
686
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
686
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
684
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
684
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
677

Compared to Other SoC

Geekbench 6 Single Core
3148 +220.9%
1322 +34.8%
715 -27.1%
355 -63.8%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
12644 +353.7%
4199 +50.7%
1900 -31.8%
1242 -55.4%
AnTuTu 10
1341448 +124.4%
794278 +32.8%
456569 -23.6%
360090 -39.8%
AiTuTu 3
389919 +8%
368016 +1.9%
288795 -20%
232946 -35.5%