AMD Radeon Pro 560

AMD Radeon Pro 560: A Professional Tool with Glances at the Past
April 2025
Introduction
The AMD Radeon Pro 560 graphics card, released in 2017, remains a niche solution for professionals who value stability and compatibility. Despite its outdated architecture, it remains relevant in specific scenarios. In this article, we'll explore who should pay attention to this model in 2025.
Architecture and Key Features
Polaris: Reliability Over Innovation
The Radeon Pro 560 is built on the Polaris (14nm GlobalFoundries technology) architecture. This generation is known for its energy efficiency, but it lacks support for modern features such as hardware ray tracing or AI acceleration.
Unique Technologies:
- FidelityFX: AMD's toolkit for image enhancement (contrast sharpening, upscaling). However, only the basic version is implemented in the Pro 560, without hardware optimization.
- FreeSync: Support for adaptive synchronization for comfortable real-time rendering.
What It Lacks:
- Counterparts to DLSS (NVIDIA) or Ray Accelerators (RDNA 2/3). Ray tracing requires software emulation, which significantly reduces performance.
Memory: Modest Specifications
- Type: GDDR5 (an outdated standard relevant in 2016-2019).
- Volume: 4 GB — the minimum level for professional tasks in 2025.
- Bandwidth: 224 GB/s (256-bit bus, 7 GHz frequency).
Impact on Performance:
- In games: 4 GB is sufficient for 1080p at medium settings, but projects with HD textures (e.g., Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty) experience drops due to buffer overflows.
- In professional applications: Limited memory complicates work with heavy 3D scenes or 8K video.
Gaming Performance: Modest Ambitions
The Radeon Pro 560 is aimed at the professional segment, but let's assess its gaming potential:
- 1080p (Medium settings):
- Apex Legends: 45–55 FPS.
- Fortnite: 50–60 FPS (no Ray Tracing).
- Hogwarts Legacy: 25–30 FPS (lower detail settings required).
- 1440p and 4K:
- Not recommended. Even in less demanding games (CS2, DOTA 2), the frame rate rarely exceeds 40 FPS.
Ray Tracing:
The lack of hardware support makes RTX effects (reflections, global illumination) inaccessible without a critical drop in FPS.
Professional Tasks: Narrow Specialization
Video Editing
- Premiere Pro: Rendering 1080p projects with basic effects results in 60-70% GPU load. A 4K timeline causes lag even in proxy mode.
- DaVinci Resolve: OpenCL support ensures stability, but export speed is 2-3 times slower than the Radeon Pro W6600.
3D Modeling
- Blender (Cycles): Rendering the BMW Benchmark scene takes ~45 minutes (compared to 8 minutes on RX 7600).
- AutoCAD: Sufficient for 2D drawings, but complex 3D models need optimization.
Scientific Computing
- OpenCL: Support exists, but performance in tasks like molecular modeling lags even behind budget NVIDIA GTX 1650.
Power Consumption and Heat Dissipation
- TDP: 75 W — powered through the PCIe slot, no additional cable required.
- Cooling: Both passive and active (with a fan) options. For prolonged loads, an active system is preferable.
- Case Recommendations:
- At least 1 intake fan and 1 exhaust fan.
- Compact cases (e.g., Fractal Design Core 500) are suitable, but avoid "hot" builds with multiple HDDs.
Comparison with Competitors
In the Professional Segment:
- NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (4 GB GDDR5): Comparable in performance, but worse in OpenCL tasks. Price: $250–300.
- AMD Radeon Pro W6600 (8 GB GDDR6): 2-3 times faster, supports AV1 and PCIe 4.0. Price: $500–600.
In the Gaming Segment:
- NVIDIA GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6): 15-20% faster in games, similar price ($200–230).
Practical Tips
Power Supply
- Power: 300–400 W (e.g., Corsair CX450).
- Connectors: 6-pin PCIe (not always required).
Compatibility
- Platforms: Windows 10/11, Linux (with open drivers), macOS (only in older Mac Pro models).
- Motherboards: PCIe 3.0 x16.
Drivers
- Radeon Pro Software: Stable but lacks support for new APIs (DirectX 12 Ultimate). Updates are infrequent.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Low power consumption.
- Silent versions with passive cooling.
- Optimization for professional applications (SolidWorks, AutoCAD).
Cons:
- Outdated architecture.
- Weak gaming potential.
- Limited memory capacity.
Final Conclusion: Who is Radeon Pro 560 Suitable For?
This graphics card is a choice for:
1. Professionals using specialized software with a focus on stability (e.g., CAD designers).
2. Owners of old PCs who need an upgrade without replacing the power supply.
3. Hackintosh enthusiasts building systems for macOS.
Why not for gamers? Even budget models from 2025 (like the Intel Arc A580) offer better performance for the same $200–250.
If you're seeking a "workhorse" for less demanding tasks, the Radeon Pro 560 can still serve. However, for a future-proof build, consider modern solutions like the Radeon Pro W7600 or NVIDIA RTX A2000.