AMD A6-3400M

AMD A6-3400M

AMD A6-3400M: An Outdated Yet Practical Choice for Basic Tasks?

An Analysis of a 2011 Processor in the Context of 2025


Architecture and Manufacturing Process: The Fusion Era

The AMD A6-3400M processor, released in 2011, was part of the Llano line — the first generation of AMD Fusion hybrid chips that combined CPU and GPU on a single die. This was a bold step aimed at competing with Intel in the budget segment.

Key Characteristics:

- Manufacturing process: 32 nm (standard back in 2011, but outdated by 2025 by 3 generations).

- Cores and Threads: 4 physical cores (without Hyper-Threading support), 4 threads.

- Frequencies: Base frequency — 1.4 GHz, Turbo mode — up to 2.3 GHz (activated under load on 1-2 cores).

- Integrated Graphics: Radeon HD 6520G (320 stream processors, 400 MHz).

Architectural Features:

- CPU: Based on the K10 microarchitecture, optimized for multi-threaded tasks but weak in single-thread performance.

- GPU: The HD 6520G supported DirectX 11, allowing games from 2010-2013 to run at low settings. For its time, this was an advantage over Intel’s HD Graphics 3000.


Power Consumption and TDP: Balance or Compromise?

The TDP of 35 watts was considered moderate for mobile processors in 2011, but by 2025, it seems excessive. For instance, modern AMD Ryzen 5 7540U (Zen 4, 4 nm) shows 5-7 times greater performance with a TDP of 15-28 watts.

What does this mean for the user?

- Laptops with A6-3400M required active cooling, which increased the weight and thickness of devices (up to 25-30 mm).

- Power-saving technologies: Cool'n'Quiet (reducing frequency at idle), PowerNow! (dynamic voltage management).


Performance: What Can You Do in 2025?

Office Tasks:

- A browser with 5-10 tabs, Word, Excel — function, but with delays. For example, launching Google Sheets with large spreadsheets will take 3-5 seconds.

- Video calls: Zoom or Teams at 720p — possible stuttering due to weak single-core performance (Geekbench 6: 227).

Multimedia:

- Playing Full HD videos: No problems, but 4K is not supported hardware-wise.

- Editing in Shotcut or DaVinci Resolve: Rendering a 1080p video will take 4-5 times longer compared to Ryzen 5 5500U.

Gaming:

- Games from 2010-2013: World of Warcraft (30 FPS on low settings), Minecraft (40-50 FPS), Dota 2 (25-30 FPS).

- Modern projects: Even Fortnite at 720p and minimum settings yields 10-15 FPS — unacceptable.

Turbo Core Mode:

- Frequency increases to 2.3 GHz only under load on 1-2 cores. In multi-threaded scenarios (rendering, archiving), it operates at the base speed of 1.4 GHz.


Use Cases: Who is A6-3400M Suitable for in 2025?

1. Students: For typing, viewing lectures, working with PDFs.

2. Retirees: Social networking, online television, Skype.

3. Backup Laptop: For travel, where there is a high risk of losing or damaging the device.

Not Suitable For:

- Gamers, designers, programmers, video editors.


Battery Life: How Long Will It Last?

- A typical laptop from 2011-2013 with A6-3400M had a 44 Wh battery. Under moderate load (Chrome, YouTube), the runtime is about 2.5-3.5 hours.

- In power-saving mode (50% brightness, Wi-Fi on) — up to 4 hours.

Problem: High TDP and outdated manufacturing process make it non-competitive even with budget Intel Celeron N4500 (6 W TDP, 10 nm).


Comparison with Competitors: Where Was Llano Strong?

2011-2013:

- Intel Core i3-2350M (2 cores, 4 threads): Better in single-thread tasks (+15-20%), but weaker in graphics (HD 3000 vs HD 6520G).

- AMD A8-3500M: Architecturally similar, but with a more powerful GPU (HD 6620G).

2025:

- Intel N100 (Alder Lake-N): 6 W TDP, 4 cores, 3.4 GHz, Geekbench 6 Single-Core — 1800.

- Apple M1: Energy efficiency and performance are unmatched.


Pros and Cons of A6-3400M in 2025

Pros:

- Extremely low price: Used laptops are around $50-100.

- Repairability: Upgrading RAM and HDD to SSD will extend the lifespan of the device.

- Support for Windows 10 (officially) and Linux (Lubuntu, Xubuntu).

Cons:

- No support for modern instructions (AVX, AES).

- Maximum of 16 GB RAM (DDR3-1333).

- Lack of hardware decoding for VP9/AV1.


Laptop Selection Recommendations

If you still decide to get a device with A6-3400M (like a used Dell Inspiron 15R or HP Pavilion g6):

1. Upgrade HDD to SSD: A Samsung 870 EVO 250 GB ($35) will speed up system boot time by 3-4 times.

2. Add RAM: 8 GB DDR3 is the minimum for browsing and office tasks.

3. Install a lightweight OS: Windows 10 LTSC or Linux Mint Xfce.

Important: No new laptops with this processor have been released since 2014.


Final Conclusion: Who Is A6-3400M Suitable For?

This processor is a relic of the past that is relevant in 2025 only as:

- A budget solution for basic tasks (if there's no $200 for a modern Chromebook).

- Almost a "rarity" for enthusiasts collecting retro tech.

Key Benefits:

- Minimal investment.

- Easy upgrades (SSD, RAM).

- Compatibility with older programs and games (for example, Windows XP).

2025 Alternatives: New laptops with Intel N100 (starting at $250) or AMD Athlon Silver 7120U (starting at $300) are 3-5 times faster, with battery life of 8-12 hours.


If you need a computer "here and now" and your budget is nearly zero — A6-3400M might be a temporary solution. However, even in 2025, it is wiser to add an extra $100-150 and buy a device with a processor from 2020 or later: it will last longer and avoid performance issues.

Basic

Label Name
AMD
Platform
Mobile
Launch Date
June 2011
Model Name
?
The Intel processor number is just one of several factors - along with processor brand, system configurations, and system-level benchmarks - to be considered when choosing the right processor for your computing needs.
A6-3400M
Code Name
Llano
Generation
A6 (Llano)

CPU Specifications

Total Cores
?
Cores is a hardware term that describes the number of independent central processing units in a single computing component (die or chip).
4
Total Threads
?
Where applicable, Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology is only available on Performance-cores.
4
Basic Frequency
1400 MHz
Max Turbo Frequency
?
Max Turbo Frequency is the maximum single-core frequency at which the processor is capable of operating using Intel® Turbo Boost Technology and, if present, Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 and Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost. Frequency is typically measured in gigahertz (GHz), or billion cycles per second.
up to 2.3 GHz
L1 Cache
128 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Multiplier
14.0x
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
CPU Socket
?
The socket is the component that provides the mechanical and electrical connections between the processor and motherboard.
AMD Socket FS1
Multiplier Unlocked
No
Technology
?
Lithography refers to the semiconductor technology used to manufacture an integrated circuit, and is reported in nanometer (nm), indicative of the size of features built on the semiconductor.
32 nm
TDP
35 W
Transistors
1,178 million

Memory Specifications

Memory Type
?
Intel® processors come in four different types: Single Channel, Dual Channel, Triple Channel, and Flex Mode. Maximum supported memory speed may be lower when populating multiple DIMMs per channel on products that support multiple memory channels.
DDR3
Memory Channels
?
The number of memory channels refers to the bandwidth operation for real world application.
Dual-channel
ECC Memory
No

GPU Specifications

Integrated Graphics Model
?
An integrated GPU refers to the graphics core that is integrated into the CPU processor. Leveraging the processor's powerful computational capabilities and intelligent power efficiency management, it delivers outstanding graphics performance and a smooth application experience at a lower power consumption.
Radeon HD 6520G

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
227
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
516
Geekbench 5
Single Core Score
222
Geekbench 5
Multi Core Score
617
Passmark CPU
Single Core Score
688
Passmark CPU
Multi Core Score
1188

Compared to Other CPU

Geekbench 6 Single Core
357 +57.3%
313 +37.9%
257 +13.2%
227
32 -85.9%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
713 +38.2%
627 +21.5%
516
372 -27.9%
151 -70.7%
Geekbench 5 Single Core
335 +50.9%
298 +34.2%
243 +9.5%
222
59 -73.4%
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
802 +30%
713 +15.6%
617
497 -19.4%
375 -39.2%
Passmark CPU Single Core
908 +32%
802 +16.6%
688
569 -17.3%
419 -39.1%
Passmark CPU Multi Core
1424 +19.9%
1295 +9%
1188
1020 -14.1%
792 -33.3%