AMD A4-3300M

AMD A4-3300M

AMD A4-3300M: Review of an Outdated Notebook Processor for Basic Tasks

Analysis of Capabilities and Market Position in 2025


Architecture and Technology Process: The Foundation of Llano

The AMD A4-3300M processor, released in 2011, belongs to the Llano platform and is manufactured using a 32-nanometer technology process. This hybrid solution (APU) combines two CPU cores with integrated Radeon HD 6480G graphics.

CPU Part

- Cores and Threads: 2 cores, 2 threads (with no support for Hyper-Threading or SMT).

- Clock Speeds: Base clock — 1.9 GHz, maximum turbo mode — 2.5 GHz. Turbo mode is activated under load on one core but does not work when both are in use.

- Architecture: Based on the K10.5 (Husky) microarchitecture, which is considered archaic by 2025. It lacks support for modern instructions like AVX, limiting compatibility with new software.

Integrated Graphics (iGPU)

The Radeon HD 6480G features 160 stream processors running at 444 MHz. The graphics support DirectX 11 and resolutions up to 1080p, but in 2025 games, even at low settings, it manages frame rates below 15 FPS.


Power Consumption and TDP: Balancing Power and Heat

The processor's TDP is 35 W, which is considered high for modern ultrabooks. For example, the Apple M3 (2025) has a TDP of only 10–15 W while delivering significantly greater performance.

- Heat Generation: Notebooks with A4-3300M often featured modest cooling solutions, resulting in overheating during prolonged load.

- Energy Efficiency: The lack of modern technologies like adaptive frequency scaling (similar to Intel SpeedShift) makes the processor less flexible in power management.


Performance: Real-world Scenario Tests

Scores in Geekbench 6 (226/393) indicate that the A4-3300M lags behind even budget processors of 2025. For example, the Intel Celeron N5100 (2021) scores around 400 points in single-threaded testing.

Office Tasks

- Documents and Browser: Working with Google Docs and 5–10 tabs in Chrome is possible, but there are delays when switching between applications.

- Video Calls: Zoom or Google Meet at 720p puts a load of 80–90%, with possible stuttering.

Multimedia

- Video: Playback of 1080p/60 FPS (H.264) is stable, but 4K or HEVC is not supported by hardware.

- Photo Editors: Adobe Lightroom runs extremely slowly; suitable only for basic retouching.

Gaming

- Older Games: Minecraft (2011) — 30–40 FPS on low settings, CS:GO — 20–25 FPS.

- Modern Titles: Even indie games like Hades (2020) run at less than 15 FPS.


Usage Scenarios: Who Is the A4-3300M Suitable for in 2025?

This processor is pertinent only for limited tasks:

1. Office Laptop: Working with texts, spreadsheets, PDFs.

2. Educational Devices: For schoolchildren or students learning basic programs.

3. Backup Device: As a temporary solution when the main device fails.

Not Suitable for:

- Video editing, 3D modeling.

- Modern gaming.

- Running neural network applications (e.g., stable operation of AI assistants).


Battery Life: How Long Will It Last?

With a TDP of 35 W, laptops with the A4-3300M rarely came equipped with batteries of 40–50 Wh. In 2025, such devices (if new) offer:

- 4–5 hours when working with documents.

- 2–3 hours when watching YouTube.

Power-saving Technologies:

- AMD PowerNow!: Dynamic frequency and voltage scaling.

- CoolCore: Disabling unused CPU blocks.

However, these technologies are inferior to Intel EIST or AMD SenseMI (in newer models).


Comparison with Competitors

AMD

- A6-3420M (Llano, 4 cores): 15–20% faster in multi-threaded tasks, but with TDP of 35 W.

- Ryzen 3 3250U (2020): Performance doubled at TDP 15 W.

Intel

- Core i3-2350M (Sandy Bridge, 2011): Comparable CPU performance but weaker graphics (Intel HD 3000).

- Celeron N5100 (2021): 50% faster in single-threaded tasks, TDP 6 W.

Apple

Comparison is invalid: even the Apple M1 (2020) outperforms the A4-3300M by 5–7 times.


Pros and Cons

Strengths:

- Low cost of laptops (new models starting from $250).

- Sufficient performance for basic tasks.

- Support for DirectX 11 (for its time).

Weaknesses:

- Outdated architecture.

- High power consumption.

- No support for modern standards (USB 3.1, Wi-Fi 6).


Recommendations for Choosing a Laptop

If you're considering a device with the A4-3300M in 2025, pay attention to:

1. Purpose: Only for office and educational use.

2. RAM Size: Minimum of 8 GB (laptops often come with 4 GB — this is insufficient).

3. Display: IPS panel with 1080p resolution (many budget models have TN 1366x768).

4. Battery: Capacity of at least 48 Wh.

Examples of New Laptops:

- HP 255 G8 (analog with Ryzen 3 3250U) — $399.

- Lenovo IdeaPad 1 (Intel Celeron N5100) — $329.


Final Conclusion: Who Is the AMD A4-3300M Suitable For?

This processor is a choice for those seeking an extremely budget device for elementary tasks. Its advantages are price and ability to work with office software, but by 2025, it is hopelessly outdated.

Key Benefits:

- Affordability.

- Compatibility with Windows 10/11 (with limitations).

Recommendation: Consider modern AMD Ryzen 3 APUs or Intel Celeron N-series — they are more expensive by $50-$100 but offer vastly better performance and battery life.


Note: Laptops with the A4-3300M in 2025 are rare. Most new devices in the sub-$400 segment use more modern chips.

Basic

Label Name
AMD
Platform
Mobile
Launch Date
June 2011
Model Name
?
The Intel processor number is just one of several factors - along with processor brand, system configurations, and system-level benchmarks - to be considered when choosing the right processor for your computing needs.
A4-3300M
Code Name
Llano
Generation
A4 (Llano)

CPU Specifications

Total Cores
?
Cores is a hardware term that describes the number of independent central processing units in a single computing component (die or chip).
2
Total Threads
?
Where applicable, Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology is only available on Performance-cores.
2
Basic Frequency
1900 MHz
Max Turbo Frequency
?
Max Turbo Frequency is the maximum single-core frequency at which the processor is capable of operating using Intel® Turbo Boost Technology and, if present, Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 and Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost. Frequency is typically measured in gigahertz (GHz), or billion cycles per second.
up to 2.5 GHz
L1 Cache
128 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Multiplier
19.0x
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
CPU Socket
?
The socket is the component that provides the mechanical and electrical connections between the processor and motherboard.
AMD Socket FS1
Multiplier Unlocked
No
Technology
?
Lithography refers to the semiconductor technology used to manufacture an integrated circuit, and is reported in nanometer (nm), indicative of the size of features built on the semiconductor.
32 nm
TDP
35 W
Transistors
1,178 million

Memory Specifications

Memory Type
?
Intel® processors come in four different types: Single Channel, Dual Channel, Triple Channel, and Flex Mode. Maximum supported memory speed may be lower when populating multiple DIMMs per channel on products that support multiple memory channels.
DDR3
Memory Channels
?
The number of memory channels refers to the bandwidth operation for real world application.
Dual-channel
ECC Memory
No

GPU Specifications

Integrated Graphics Model
?
An integrated GPU refers to the graphics core that is integrated into the CPU processor. Leveraging the processor's powerful computational capabilities and intelligent power efficiency management, it delivers outstanding graphics performance and a smooth application experience at a lower power consumption.
Radeon HD 6480G

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
226
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
393
Geekbench 5
Single Core Score
279
Geekbench 5
Multi Core Score
497
Passmark CPU
Single Core Score
786
Passmark CPU
Multi Core Score
707

Compared to Other CPU

Geekbench 6 Single Core
357 +58%
313 +38.5%
257 +13.7%
226
32 -85.8%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
693 +76.3%
601 +52.9%
500 +27.2%
393
58 -85.2%
Geekbench 5 Single Core
361 +29.4%
324 +16.1%
279
226 -19%
138 -50.5%
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
713 +43.5%
617 +24.1%
497
375 -24.5%
174 -65%
Passmark CPU Single Core
962 +22.4%
897 +14.1%
786
678 -13.7%
546 -30.5%
Passmark CPU Multi Core
1109 +56.9%
928 +31.3%
707
485 -31.4%
184 -74%