AMD A4-3330MX

AMD A4-3330MX

AMD A4-3330MX in 2025: An Outdated Processor for Basic Tasks

Overview of Capabilities, Use Cases, and Alternatives


Architecture and Process Technology: A Legacy of the Fusion Era

The AMD A4-3330MX processor, released in 2011-2012, belongs to the Llano generation—one of AMD's first experiments in combining CPU and GPU on a single chip (Fusion technology).

Key Specifications

- Process Technology: 32 nm (for comparison, modern AMD and Intel chips use 5–7 nm).

- Cores and Threads: 2 cores, 2 threads—limited multitasking capability.

- Frequencies: Base—2.2 GHz, turbo mode—up to 2.6 GHz (a slight boost for single-threaded workloads).

- Integrated Graphics: Radeon HD 6480G (160 stream processors, 444 MHz).

The Llano architecture focused on balancing CPU and GPU, yet even in its time, it lagged behind Intel in IPC (instructions per clock). By 2025, this solution appears archaic: lack of support for modern instructions (AVX2, AI accelerators), small cache (1 MB L2), outdated memory controller (DDR3-1600).


Power Consumption and TDP: The Cost of Performance

TDP of 45 W—a high figure even for budget laptops in 2025 (modern models: 15–28 W). This implies:

- A requirement for a massive cooling system, increasing the device's weight and thickness.

- Rapid battery drain—battery life rarely exceeds 3–4 hours under active use.

However, for its time, such a TDP was a compromise: Llano was marketed as a solution for entry-level multimedia laptops.


Performance: What Can the A4-3330MX Do in 2025?

Benchmark results (Geekbench 6):

- Single-threaded: 235 points.

- Multi-threaded: 375 points.

Real-World Tasks

1. Office Work:

- Basic tasks (Word, Excel, browser with 5–7 tabs) are manageable but lag when switching between applications.

- Video calls in Zoom/Teams—possible freezing due to CPU load and weak graphics.

2. Multimedia:

- Playing Full HD video (YouTube, Netflix)—manageable, but 4K is not supported.

- Photo editing in older versions of Photoshop—is extremely slow.

3. Gaming:

- 2010s games on low settings: League of Legends (30–40 FPS), CS:GO (25–30 FPS).

- Modern titles (even indie games)—unavailable.

Turbo mode (up to 2.6 GHz) provides a 10–15% boost, but due to heating and TDP limitations, it operates only briefly.


Use Cases: Who Is the A4-3330MX Suitable For?

In 2025, this processor is relevant only in two scenarios:

1. Budget Laptops Under $300: For example, refurbished models for basic tasks (like the 2012 HP Pavilion G6).

2. Specialized Tasks:

- Data entry terminals.

- Devices running office software on Linux (Lubuntu, Xubuntu).

Who It’s Not Suitable For:

- Students needing to work with graphic editors or compile code.

- Gamers and streamers.

- Users requiring more than 5 hours of battery life.


Battery Life: How Long Will the Battery Last?

Laptops with the A4-3330MX were equipped with 40–48 Wh batteries. By 2025, such batteries have degraded, so real usage time is approximately 2–3 hours when:

- Browsing web pages.

- Working in a text editor.

Power-Saving Technologies:

- Cool’n’Quiet—reduces frequency during idle.

- PowerNow!—dynamic voltage management.

These features lag behind modern Intel (SpeedShift) or AMD (CEP) counterparts.


Comparison with Competitors: Where Does the A4-3330MX Fit?

Modern Equivalents (2025)

AMD A4-3330MX (2011):

- Process Technology: 32 nm

- TDP: 45 W

- Geekbench 6 Single: 235

- Graphics: Radeon HD 6480G

AMD Ryzen 3 7320U (2023):

- Process Technology: 6 nm

- TDP: 15 W

- Geekbench 6 Single: 1250

- Graphics: Radeon 610M

Intel Core i3-N305 (2023):

- Process Technology: 10 nm

- TDP: 15 W

- Geekbench 6 Single: 950

- Graphics: UHD Graphics

Apple M1 (2020):

- Process Technology: 5 nm

- TDP: 10–15 W

- Geekbench 6 Single: 2200

- Graphics: Apple M1 GPU

Conclusions:

- Even budget processors from 2023-2024 (like the Ryzen 3 7320U for $400–500) are 4–5 times faster.

- The Apple M1 (used in the 2025 MacBook Air starting at $799) demonstrates a significant gap in energy efficiency.


Pros and Cons of the AMD A4-3330MX

Pros:

- Low cost of devices (new laptops with similar performance are rare; refurbished models range from $150–250).

- Support for DirectX 11 for running old games.

Cons:

- Outdated architecture: does not support Windows 11 (only Windows 10 or Linux).

- High power consumption.

- Lack of optimization for modern applications.


Recommendations for Choosing a Laptop

If you are considering a device with the A4-3330MX in 2025:

1. Check the battery condition: Replace it if the capacity is below 70%.

2. SSD is a must: Replacing the HDD with an SSD (250 GB—$20–30) will speed up the system.

3. RAM: Minimum of 8 GB (DDR3).

Alternatives:

- Budget Up to $400: Laptops with Intel N100 (Acer Aspire 1, $329)—battery life up to 10 hours, supporting Wi-Fi 6.

- Budget Up to $600: Lenovo IdeaPad with Ryzen 5 7520U ($549)—4 cores, 8 threads, Radeon 610M graphics.


Final Verdict: Should You Buy It?

The AMD A4-3330MX is a relic of the past which in 2025 is suitable for:

- Users needing a cheap PC for document printing or browsing.

- Serving as a backup device or for specific tasks (like running software requiring legacy drivers).

Key Benefits:

- Extremely low price.

- Easy upgrade path (HDD to SSD, adding RAM).

However, for the majority of users, even budget modern laptops will be a better choice due to performance, battery life, and support for current technologies.


If you're looking for a device "for a year" while saving for something more powerful, the A4-3330MX could be a temporary solution. But in the long run, invest in modern chips—they will pay for themselves in saved time and frustration.

Basic

Label Name
AMD
Platform
Mobile
Launch Date
December 2011
Model Name
?
The Intel processor number is just one of several factors - along with processor brand, system configurations, and system-level benchmarks - to be considered when choosing the right processor for your computing needs.
A4-3330MX
Code Name
Llano
Generation
A4 (Llano)

CPU Specifications

Total Cores
?
Cores is a hardware term that describes the number of independent central processing units in a single computing component (die or chip).
2
Total Threads
?
Where applicable, Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology is only available on Performance-cores.
2
Basic Frequency
2.2 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency
?
Max Turbo Frequency is the maximum single-core frequency at which the processor is capable of operating using Intel® Turbo Boost Technology and, if present, Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 and Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost. Frequency is typically measured in gigahertz (GHz), or billion cycles per second.
up to 2.6 GHz
L1 Cache
128 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Multiplier
22.0x
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
CPU Socket
?
The socket is the component that provides the mechanical and electrical connections between the processor and motherboard.
AMD Socket FS1
Multiplier Unlocked
No
Technology
?
Lithography refers to the semiconductor technology used to manufacture an integrated circuit, and is reported in nanometer (nm), indicative of the size of features built on the semiconductor.
32 nm
TDP
45 W
Transistors
1,178 million

Memory Specifications

Memory Type
?
Intel® processors come in four different types: Single Channel, Dual Channel, Triple Channel, and Flex Mode. Maximum supported memory speed may be lower when populating multiple DIMMs per channel on products that support multiple memory channels.
DDR3
Memory Channels
?
The number of memory channels refers to the bandwidth operation for real world application.
Dual-channel
ECC Memory
No

GPU Specifications

Integrated Graphics Model
?
An integrated GPU refers to the graphics core that is integrated into the CPU processor. Leveraging the processor's powerful computational capabilities and intelligent power efficiency management, it delivers outstanding graphics performance and a smooth application experience at a lower power consumption.
Radeon HD 6480G

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6
Single Core Score
235
Geekbench 6
Multi Core Score
375
Geekbench 5
Single Core Score
278
Geekbench 5
Multi Core Score
491
Passmark CPU
Single Core Score
908
Passmark CPU
Multi Core Score
756

Compared to Other CPU

Geekbench 6 Single Core
357 +51.9%
313 +33.2%
257 +9.4%
235
32 -86.4%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
693 +84.8%
601 +60.3%
500 +33.3%
375
58 -84.5%
Geekbench 5 Single Core
359 +29.1%
320 +15.1%
278
218 -21.6%
130 -53.2%
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
711 +44.8%
611 +24.4%
491
368 -25.1%
173 -64.8%
Passmark CPU Single Core
1032 +13.7%
972 +7%
908
802 -11.7%
688 -24.2%
Passmark CPU Multi Core
1139 +50.7%
991 +31.1%
756
526 -30.4%
305 -59.7%