Unisoc T820
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Unisoc T820
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2700 MHz (2700 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: November 2022 (November 2022 vs May 2021)
Basic
Unisoc
Label Name
Qualcomm
November 2022
Launch Date
May 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
-
T820
Model Name
SM7325
1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
6 nm
2700 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G57 MP4
GPU name
Adreno 642L
780 MHz
GPU frequency
490 MHz
0.4352 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
64
Shading units
384
4
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
3440 x 1440
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 1200 Mbps
LTE Cat. 15
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
-
5.0
Bluetooth
5.2
5
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Max camera resolution
1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
-
TDP
5 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 770
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
T820
764
Snapdragon 778G
981
+28%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
T820
2301
Snapdragon 778G
2787
+21%
AnTuTu 10
T820
482197
Snapdragon 778G
597891
+24%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
ZTE Nubia Neo 2 5G
Unisoc T820
4703
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6439
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
ZTE Nubia Neo 2 5G
Unisoc T820
3626
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5063
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
ZTE Nubia Neo 2 5G
Unisoc T820
3366
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
4588
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
ZTE Nubia Neo 5G
Unisoc T820
206
Oppo Reno7 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
234
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
ZTE Nubia Neo 2 5G
Unisoc T820
27921
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
28872
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
ZTE Nubia Neo 5G
Unisoc T820
12776
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
13272
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/unisoc-t820-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-778g" target="_blank">Unisoc T820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G</a>