Unisoc T820
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Unisoc T820
and
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2700 MHz (2700 MHz vs 2600 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: November 2022 (November 2022 vs January 2021)
Basic
Unisoc
Label Name
MediaTek
November 2022
Launch Date
January 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
T820
Model Name
MT6891Z/CZA
1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
6 nm
2700 MHz
Frequency
2600 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G57 MP4
GPU name
Mali-G77 MP9
780 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
0.4352 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.9792 TFLOPS
64
Shading units
64
4
Execution units
9
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
3440 x 1440
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 4700 Mbps
LTE Cat. 15
4G support
LTE Cat. 19
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.0
Bluetooth
5.2
5
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
320 KB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 32MP
eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
-
TDP
10 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 3.0
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
T820
764
Dimensity 1100
1107
+45%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
T820
2301
Dimensity 1100
3332
+45%
FP32 (float)
T820
444
Dimensity 1100
999
+125%
AnTuTu 10
T820
482197
Dimensity 1100
770936
+60%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
ZTE Nubia Neo 2 5G
Unisoc T820
4703
Realme Q3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
7788
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
ZTE Nubia Neo 5G
Unisoc T820
206
Vivo S9
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
444
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
ZTE Nubia Neo 2 5G
Unisoc T820
27921
Realme Q3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
32374
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
ZTE Nubia Neo 5G
Unisoc T820
12776
Realme Q3 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
13368
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/unisoc-t820-vs-mediatek-dimensity-1100" target="_blank">Unisoc T820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100</a>