Samsung Exynos 9825
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 9825
and
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (7 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3250 MHz (2730 MHz vs 3250 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: December 2024 (August 2019 vs December 2024)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
August 2019
Launch Date
December 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E9825
Model Name
Dimensity 8400
2x 2.73 GHz – M4
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3.0 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3.0 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
8
Cores
8
7 nm
Technology
4 nm
2730 MHz
Frequency
3250 MHz
8.5
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Mali-G76 MP12
GPU name
Mali-G720 MC7
754 MHz
GPU frequency
1400 MHz
0.6515 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
36
Shading units
-
12
Execution units
6
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2400
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 2000 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7900 Mbps
LTE Cat. 20
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.0
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
8533 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
2 MB
L2 Cache
3.5 MB
-
L3 cache
6 MB
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 32MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
9 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek NPU 880
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 9825
674
Dimensity 8400
1684
+150%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 9825
2377
Dimensity 8400
6970
+193%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 9825
679606
Dimensity 8400
1772345
+161%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
393
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
1435
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
3404
Infinix GT 50 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
10976
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
1107
Infinix GT 50 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
3938
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy M62
Samsung Exynos 9825
3484
Infinix GT 50 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
13048
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9825
9318
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
9483
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-9825-vs-mediatek-dimensity-8400" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400</a>