Samsung Exynos 1380
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1380
and
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3250 MHz (2400 MHz vs 3250 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: December 2024 (February 2023 vs December 2024)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
February 2023
Launch Date
December 2024
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E8835
Model Name
Dimensity 8400
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3.0 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3.0 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
3250 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G68 MP5
GPU name
Mali-G720 MC7
950 MHz
GPU frequency
1400 MHz
0.608 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
5
Execution units
6
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
Connectivity
Up to 3790 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7900 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
8533 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
3.5 MB
-
L3 cache
6 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
5 W
TDP
-
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek NPU 880
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1380
1008
Dimensity 8400
1684
+67%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1380
2773
Dimensity 8400
6970
+151%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1380
578941
Dimensity 8400
1772345
+206%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380
295
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
1435
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A26 (Exynos 1380)
Samsung Exynos 1380
13227
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
9483
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1380-vs-mediatek-dimensity-8400" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400</a>