Samsung Exynos 2600
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2600
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 2 nm (2 nm vs 4 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2026 (January 2026 vs December 2021)
- Higher Frequency: 3000 MHz (3.8 GHz vs 3000 MHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Qualcomm
January 2026
Launch Date
December 2021
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung Foundry (2 nm GAA)
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E9965
Model Name
SM8450
1× C1-Ultra up to 3.8 GHz; 3× C1-Pro up to 3.25 GHz; 6× C1-Pro up to 2.75 GHz
Architecture
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
10
Cores
8
2 nm
Technology
4 nm
3.8 GHz
Frequency
3000 MHz
GPU Specifications
Xclipse 960
GPU name
Adreno 730
-
GPU frequency
818 MHz
-
FLOPS
2.5128 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
768
-
Execution units
2
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.1
Up to 4K@120 Hz
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
-
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
-
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
-
5G support
Yes
-
Bluetooth
5.3
-
Wi-Fi
6
-
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
-
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
-
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
1 MB
-
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Up to 320 MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 4.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
Up to 8K@30 fps encode; up to 4K@120 fps recording; HDR
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, AV1; APV (Advanced Professional Video)
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Up to 8K@60 fps decode; HDR10+ playback
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
-
TDP
5.3 W
Armv9.3-A (AArch64), SME2
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
NPU/AI engine: 32K MAC; up to +113% gen-AI performance vs Exynos 2500
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2600
3150
+89%
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1664
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2600
11100
+175%
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
4030
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
3108
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
790
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
133077
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
33310
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20423
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
13969
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2600-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-8-gen-1" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1</a>