MediaTek Dimensity 8200
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
and
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3100 MHz (3100 MHz vs 3000 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: December 2022 (December 2022 vs December 2021)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Qualcomm
December 2022
Launch Date
December 2021
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
MT6896Z
Model Name
SM8450
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
Architecture
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3100 MHz
Frequency
3000 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP6
GPU name
Adreno 730
950 MHz
GPU frequency
818 MHz
1.442 TFLOPS
FLOPS
2.5128 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
768
6
Execution units
2
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.1
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
-
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
Up to 4700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 10000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 21
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
1 MB
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
6 W
TDP
5.3 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
MediaTek APU 580
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8200
1229
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1664
+35%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8200
3892
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
4030
+4%
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 8200
1413
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2462
+74%
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8200
915634
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1096529
+20%
AiTuTu 3
Dimensity 8200
117961
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
800624
+579%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Vivo V30 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
9417
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10505
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Unihertz 8849 Tank 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
10881
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
11920
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
676
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
790
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo V27 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6567
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
9565
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1790
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2548
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6519
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10361
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Cubot Max 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
34102
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
33310
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Oukitel WP200 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
14061
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (SDM8Gen1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
13969
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1751
Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2539
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8200-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-8-gen-1" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1</a>