Google Tensor G2
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Google Tensor G2
and
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (5 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3100 MHz (2850 MHz vs 3100 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: December 2022 (October 2022 vs December 2022)
Basic
Google
Label Name
MediaTek
October 2022
Launch Date
December 2022
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Tensor G2
Model Name
MT6896Z
2x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
8
Cores
8
5 nm
Technology
4 nm
2850 MHz
Frequency
3100 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G710 MP7
GPU name
Mali-G610 MP6
850 MHz
GPU frequency
950 MHz
1.1424 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.442 TFLOPS
96
Shading units
-
7
Execution units
6
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
Connectivity
Up to 7350 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4700 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 21
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
7 W
TDP
6 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 580
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Tensor G2
1188
Dimensity 8200
1229
+3%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Tensor G2
3468
Dimensity 8200
3892
+12%
FP32 (float)
Tensor G2
1119
Dimensity 8200
1413
+26%
AnTuTu 10
Tensor G2
824434
Dimensity 8200
915634
+11%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
8943
Vivo V30 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
9417
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
10611
Unihertz 8849 Tank 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
10881
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
723
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
676
3DMark Wild Life
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
6526
Vivo V27 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6567
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
1841
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1790
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
6726
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6519
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Google Pixel Tablet
Google Tensor G2
32023
Cubot Max 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
34102
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2
11827
Oukitel WP200 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
14061
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2
1768
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1751
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/google-tensor-g2-vs-mediatek-dimensity-8200" target="_blank">Google Tensor G2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200</a>