Samsung Exynos 2600
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2600
and
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 2 nm (2 nm vs 3 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2026 (January 2026 vs November 2024)
- Higher Frequency: 3400 MHz (3.8 GHz vs 3400 MHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
January 2026
Launch Date
November 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung Foundry (2 nm GAA)
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E9965
Model Name
Dimensity 9400
1× C1-Ultra up to 3.8 GHz; 3× C1-Pro up to 3.25 GHz; 6× C1-Pro up to 2.75 GHz
Architecture
1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A730
3x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A730
10
Cores
8
2 nm
Technology
3 nm
3.8 GHz
Frequency
3400 MHz
GPU Specifications
Xclipse 960
GPU name
-
-
GPU frequency
1300 MHz
Up to 4K@120 Hz
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
Connectivity
-
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
-
5G support
Yes
-
Bluetooth
5.4
-
Wi-Fi
7
-
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5T
-
Memory frequency
4800 MHz
-
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Up to 320 MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 4.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
Up to 8K@30 fps encode; up to 4K@120 fps recording; HDR
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265 (HEVC), VP9, AV1; APV (Advanced Professional Video)
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9
Up to 8K@60 fps decode; HDR10+ playback
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Armv9.3-A (AArch64), SME2
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
NPU/AI engine: 32K MAC; up to +113% gen-AI performance vs Exynos 2500
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2600
3150
+11%
Dimensity 9400
2832
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2600
11100
Dimensity 9400
11974
+8%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
12698
Oppo Find X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
11475
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
3108
Oppo Find X8 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
2452
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
133077
Vivo X200 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
164746
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Exynos 2600)
Samsung Exynos 2600
20423
Oppo Find X8
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
16605
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2600-vs-mediatek-dimensity-9400" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2600 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400</a>