Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
Samsung Exynos 9820
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2400
and
Samsung Exynos 9820
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 8 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (3210 MHz vs 2730 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (January 2024 vs November 2018)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Samsung
January 2024
Launch Date
November 2018
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
Exynos 2400
Model Name
S5E9820
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
2x 2.73 GHz – Mongoose M4
2x 2.31 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.31 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
10
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
8 nm
3210 MHz
Frequency
2730 MHz
-
Transistor count
8.5
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU name
Mali-G76 MP12
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
702 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.607 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
36
-
Execution units
12
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.3
-
Max display resolution
3840 x 2400
-
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 2000 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 20
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.0
7
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 32MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
8K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS
-
TDP
9 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2400
2080
+178%
Exynos 9820
747
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2400
6582
+182%
Exynos 9820
2333
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2400
1698761
+157%
Exynos 9820
661858
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9820
5238
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
Samsung Galaxy S10+ (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9820
4725
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
Samsung Galaxy S10+ (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9820
367
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9820
3244
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9820
1030
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
14934
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9820
3284
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9820
8654
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Exynos 9 Octa)
Samsung Exynos 9820
8916
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2400-vs-samsung-exynos-9820" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Samsung Exynos 9820</a>