Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
Apple A19
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 2400
and
Apple A19
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 3 nm (TSMC N3P))
- Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (3210 MHz vs 2x 4.26 GHz – 4x 2.51 GHz)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Apple
January 2024
Launch Date
September 2025
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Exynos 2400
Model Name
A19
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
6-core CPU (2 performance + 4 efficiency)
10
Cores
6
4 nm
Technology
3 nm (TSMC N3P)
3210 MHz
Frequency
2x 4.26 GHz – 4x 2.51 GHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU name
Apple A19 GPU, 5-core with Neural Accelerators
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
-
Connectivity
Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
Gigabit LTE
Yes
5G support
5G (sub-6 GHz & mmWave)
5.4
Bluetooth
Bluetooth 6
7
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, BeiDou, NavIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
-
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
-
Miscellaneous
-
L1 Cache
Instruction Cache 128 KB, Data Cache 64.0 KB
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, Apple Lossless (ALAC), FLAC, MP3, Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby Atmos
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 48MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
-
8K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K Dolby Vision @60 fps; Cinematic 4K @30 fps; slo-mo 1080p @120/240 fps; Spatial Video 1080p @30 fps
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
-
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
HEVC (H.265), H.264, AV1; HDR Dolby Vision/HDR10+/HDR10/HLG
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
16-core Neural Engine
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2400
2080
A19
3559
+71%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2400
6582
A19
8710
+32%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2400
1698761
A19
1918578
+13%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
Apple iPhone 17
Apple A19
9421
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
Apple iPhone 17
Apple A19
1717
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
895
Apple iPhone 17
Apple A19
1677
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
Apple iPhone 17
Apple A19
9708
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
Apple iPhone 17
Apple A19
2130
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1865
Apple iPhone 17
Apple A19
2020
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-2400-vs-apple-a19" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Apple A19</a>