Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Samsung Exynos 2400 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Frequency: 3210 MHz (3210 MHz vs 3200 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: April 2025 (January 2024 vs April 2025)

Basic

Samsung
Label Name
Qualcomm
January 2024
Launch Date
April 2025
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Exynos 2400
Model Name
SM8735
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.02 GHz – Cortex-A720
10
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3210 MHz
Frequency
3200 MHz

GPU Specifications

Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU name
Adreno 825
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
1150 MHz
-
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160

Connectivity

Up to 10000 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4200 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
6.0
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4200 MHz
Memory frequency
4800 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

-
L2 Cache
2.75 MB
-
L3 cache
8 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
8K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
8K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 2400
2080
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
2116 +2%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 2400
6582
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
7082 +8%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 2400
1698761
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
2230196 +31%
AntuTu 11
Exynos 2400
2046435
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
2314417 +13%

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
18295
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
21083
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
8191
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
803
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
895
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
815
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
Nothing Phone (3)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
8042
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
1820
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1865
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
1804
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
OnePlus Turbo 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
16055
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
OnePlus Turbo 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
4350
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
14934
OnePlus Nord 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
17278
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
Meizu 22
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
217741
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
17084