Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 6400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1680
and
MediaTek Dimensity 6400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 6 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 2900 MHz (2900 MHz vs 2500 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (March 2026 vs February 2025)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
MediaTek
March 2026
Launch Date
February 2025
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E8865
Model Name
Dimensity 6400
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A766x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
6 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
2500 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 550
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP2
1200 MHz
GPU frequency
-
128
Shading units
64
3.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.4
Vulkan version
1.3
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12.1
DirectX version
12
Connectivity
Up to 5100 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 3300 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
6.1
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
5
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
-
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
1 MB
-
L3 cache
2 MB
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
Storage type
UFS 2.2
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
2K at 30FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Video codecs
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
2K at 30FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1680
1361
+66%
Dimensity 6400
819
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1680
4359
+106%
Dimensity 6400
2116
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1680
1408598
+222%
Dimensity 6400
437112
AntuTu 11
Exynos 1680
1390055
+139%
Dimensity 6400
581041
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
768
Realme 16 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6400
152
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
5980
Realme 16 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6400
1374
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A57
Samsung Exynos 1680
1695
Realme 16 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6400
383
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1680-vs-mediatek-dimensity-6400" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1680 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6400</a>