Samsung Exynos 1580
vs
Samsung Exynos 2500
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Samsung Exynos 1580
and
Samsung Exynos 2500
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 3 nm (4 nm vs 3 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3200 MHz (2900 MHz vs 3200 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2025 (October 2024 vs January 2025)
Basic
Samsung
Label Name
Samsung
October 2024
Launch Date
January 2025
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
Samsung
S5E8855
Model Name
Exynos 2500
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
4 nm
Technology
3 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
3200 MHz
GPU Specifications
Samsung Xclipse 540
GPU name
-
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
12.1
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 5100 Mbps
Download speed
-
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5T
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
4800 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
-
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1580
1333
Exynos 2500
2719
+104%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1580
3971
Exynos 2500
9016
+127%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1580
824714
Exynos 2500
2570180
+212%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A56
Samsung Exynos 1580
8438
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
19059
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A56
Samsung Exynos 1580
10389
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
25095
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
Samsung Exynos 1580
657
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2233
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580
681
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
2342
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580
62144
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
37192
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A56
Samsung Exynos 1580
14056
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500
16072
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/samsung-exynos-1580-vs-samsung-exynos-2500" target="_blank">Samsung Exynos 1580 vs Samsung Exynos 2500</a>