Samsung Exynos 1580
vs
Apple A16 Bionic

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Samsung Exynos 1580 and Apple A16 Bionic mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Newer Launch Date: October 2024 (October 2024 vs September 2022)
  • Higher Frequency: 3460 MHz (2900 MHz vs 3460 MHz)

Basic

Samsung
Label Name
Apple
October 2024
Launch Date
September 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
S5E8855
Model Name
APL1W10
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Architecture
2x 3.46 GHz – Everest
4x 2.02 GHz – Sawtooth
8
Cores
6
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
2900 MHz
Frequency
3460 MHz
-
Transistor count
16

GPU Specifications

Samsung Xclipse 540
GPU name
Apple A16 GPU
-
GPU frequency
1398 MHz
-
FLOPS
1.7894 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
128
-
Execution units
5
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2796 x 1290
12.1
DirectX version
-

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.3
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Neural Engine
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 48MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
NVMe
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
-
TDP
8 W
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1580
1333
A16 Bionic
2562 +92%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1580
3971
A16 Bionic
6685 +68%
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1580
824714
A16 Bionic
1421181 +72%