Apple A16 Bionic
vs
Samsung Exynos 1680
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Apple A16 Bionic
and
Samsung Exynos 1680
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3460 MHz (3460 MHz vs 2900 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: March 2026 (September 2022 vs March 2026)
Basic
Apple
Label Name
Samsung
September 2022
Launch Date
March 2026
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
APL1W10
Model Name
S5E8865
2x 3.46 GHz – Everest
4x 2.02 GHz – Sawtooth
4x 2.02 GHz – Sawtooth
Architecture
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
6
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3460 MHz
Frequency
2900 MHz
16
Transistor count
-
GPU Specifications
Apple A16 GPU
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 550
1398 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
1.7894 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
128
Shading units
128
5
Execution units
-
-
OpenCL version
3.0
-
Vulkan version
1.4
2796 x 1290
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
-
DirectX version
12.1
Connectivity
Up to 7500 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 5100 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
6.1
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
-
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
1x 48MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
NVMe
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
8 W
TDP
-
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
Neural Engine
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
A16 Bionic
2562
+88%
Exynos 1680
1361
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
A16 Bionic
6685
+53%
Exynos 1680
4359
FP32 (float)
A16 Bionic
1788
+49%
Exynos 1680
1203
AnTuTu 10
A16 Bionic
1421181
+1%
Exynos 1680
1408598
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/apple-a16-bionic-vs-samsung-exynos-1680" target="_blank">Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1680</a>