Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of Apple A16 Bionic and Samsung Exynos 2400 mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3460 MHz (3460 MHz vs 3100 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (September 2022 vs January 2024)
Basic
Apple
Label Name
Samsung
September 2022
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
APL1W10
Model Name
Exynos 2400
2x 3.46 GHz – Everest
4x 2.02 GHz – Sawtooth
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
6
Cores
10
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3460 MHz
Frequency
3100 MHz
GPU Specifications
Apple A16 GPU
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
1398 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
1.7894 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
128
Shading units
-
5
Execution units
-
2796 x 1290
Max display resolution
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
51.2 Gbit/s
Max Bandwidth
-
Miscellaneous
Neural Engine
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 48MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
NVMe
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
8 W
TDP
-
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
A16 Bionic
2562
+23%
Exynos 2400
2080
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
A16 Bionic
6685
+2%
Exynos 2400
6582
AnTuTu 10
A16 Bionic
1421181
Exynos 2400
1698761
+20%
