Samsung Exynos 1480
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G

vs

SoC Comparison Result

Below are the results of a comparison of Samsung Exynos 1480 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.

Advantages

  • Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 6 nm)
  • Higher Frequency: 2750 MHz (2750 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
  • Newer Launch Date: March 2024 (March 2024 vs May 2021)

Basic

Samsung
Label Name
Qualcomm
March 2024
Launch Date
May 2021
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
Samsung
Manufacturing
-
Exynos 1480
Model Name
SM7325
4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
8
Cores
8
4 nm
Technology
6 nm
2750 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz

GPU Specifications

-
GPU name
Adreno 642L
1300 MHz
GPU frequency
490 MHz
-
Shading units
384
-
Execution units
2
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
Vulkan version
1.1
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
-
DirectX version
12

Connectivity

-
Download speed
Up to 1200 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
-
5.3
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Memory Specifications

LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
2x 16 Bit

Miscellaneous

-
L2 Cache
2 MB
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 200MP
Max camera resolution
1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
-
TDP
5 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.4-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 770

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Exynos 1480
1158 +18%
Snapdragon 778G
981
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Exynos 1480
3485 +25%
Snapdragon 778G
2787
AnTuTu 10
Exynos 1480
720068 +20%
Snapdragon 778G
597891

Comparison of Devices

3DMark Sling Shot
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
7999
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6439
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
6066
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5063
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
4048
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
4588
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
6799
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5459
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
8928
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6663
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
459
Oppo Reno7 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
234
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
467
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
226
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
3900
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2490
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
982
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
693
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
3907
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2493
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
17597
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
28872
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A55
Samsung Exynos 1480
13186
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
13272