Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
and
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 2600 MHz (2400 MHz vs 2600 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: May 2023 (May 2021 vs May 2023)
Basic
Qualcomm
Label Name
MediaTek
May 2021
Launch Date
May 2023
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Mid range
-
Manufacturing
TSMC
SM7325
Model Name
MT6877 MT6877V/TTZA
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Architecture
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
6 nm
2400 MHz
Frequency
2600 MHz
GPU Specifications
Adreno 642L
GPU name
Mali-G68 MP4
490 MHz
GPU frequency
800 MHz
-
FLOPS
0.686 TFLOPS
384
Shading units
-
2
Execution units
4
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.1
Vulkan version
1.3
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2520 x 1080
12
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
Up to 1200 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 2770 Mbps
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
-
5G support
Yes
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 192MP, 2x 36MP
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP9
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
5 W
TDP
4 W
ARMv8.4-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Hexagon 770
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 550
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Snapdragon 778G
981
+2%
Dimensity 7050
962
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Snapdragon 778G
2787
+18%
Dimensity 7050
2364
AnTuTu 10
Snapdragon 778G
597891
+10%
Dimensity 7050
545975
AiTuTu 3
Snapdragon 778G
361114
+403%
Dimensity 7050
71822
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6439
NUU Mobile B30 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
5483
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (OpenGL ES 3.1)
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5063
NUU Mobile B30 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
4338
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan)
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
4588
Realme Narzo 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
3927
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5459
Realme 12+
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
4301
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6663
Realme Narzo 60 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
5413
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Oppo Reno7 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
234
Oukitel WP300
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
272
3DMark Wild Life
Huawei Nova 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
2490
Lava Agni 2
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
2304
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Huawei Nova 12S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
28872
Oukitel WP300
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
101528
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
13272
Lava Agni 2
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
14835
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-778g-vs-mediatek-dimensity-7050" target="_blank">Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050</a>