MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
and
Samsung Exynos 2400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Frequency: 3350 MHz (3350 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: January 2024 (November 2023 vs January 2024)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
November 2023
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Dimensity 8300 ultra
Model Name
Exynos 2400
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715, 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715, 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
4 nm
Technology
4 nm
3350 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G615 MP6
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
1400 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
-
Connectivity
Yes
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.4
Bluetooth
5.4
6
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
4266 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
MediaTek APU 780
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
-
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1506
Exynos 2400
2080
+38%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
4844
Exynos 2400
6582
+36%
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1518170
Exynos 2400
1698761
+12%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
10420
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
9580
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
21612
3DMark Solar Bay
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
4609
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
509
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
4869
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1182
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
1162
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1865
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
9801
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
2773
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
11135
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
14934
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
41915
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
13978
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8300-ultra-vs-samsung-exynos-2400" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra vs Samsung Exynos 2400</a>