MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
vs
Samsung Exynos 2400
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
and
Samsung Exynos 2400
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 3 nm (3 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3730 MHz (3730 MHz vs 3210 MHz)
- Newer Launch Date: April 2025 (April 2025 vs January 2024)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Samsung
April 2025
Launch Date
January 2024
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
MT6991 MT6991Z/TCZA
Model Name
Exynos 2400
1x 3.73 GHz – Cortex-X925, 3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4, 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
8
Cores
10
3 nm
Technology
4 nm
3730 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
1612 MHz
GPU frequency
1200 MHz
4.9521 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
128
Shading units
-
3.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
-
12.1
DirectX version
-
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
6.0
Bluetooth
5.4
7
Wi-Fi
7
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5X
5333 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
MediaTek NPU 890
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
ARMv9.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 9400 Plus
2956
+42%
Exynos 2400
2080
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 9400 Plus
9090
+38%
Exynos 2400
6582
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 9400 Plus
2678086
+58%
Exynos 2400
1698761
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
18628
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
16738
3DMark Solar Bay
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
11422
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8318
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
Realme GT 7 (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
834
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
864
3DMark Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi K80 Extreme Edition
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
789
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
895
3DMark Solar Bay Unlimited
OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
11756
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
8724
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
2427
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1868
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited
Realme GT 7 (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
2491
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
1865
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
18206
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
13892
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo X200s
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
5777
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
3812
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
Realme GT 7 (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
188713
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Samsung Exynos 2400
46819
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
Realme GT 7 (China)
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
22888
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Exynos 2400)
Samsung Exynos 2400
17419
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-9400-plus-vs-samsung-exynos-2400" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 2400</a>