MediaTek Dimensity 8200
vs
Apple A15 Bionic
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
and
Apple A15 Bionic
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (4 nm vs 5 nm)
- Newer Launch Date: December 2022 (December 2022 vs September 2021)
- Higher Frequency: 3230 MHz (3100 MHz vs 3230 MHz)
Basic
MediaTek
Label Name
Apple
December 2022
Launch Date
September 2021
SmartPhone Flagship
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
MT6896Z
Model Name
APL1W07
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
Architecture
2x 3.23 GHz – Avalanche, 4x 2.02 GHz – Blizzard
8
Cores
6
4 nm
Technology
5 nm
3100 MHz
Frequency
3230 MHz
-
Transistor count
15
GPU Specifications
Mali-G610 MP6
GPU name
Apple A15 GPU
950 MHz
GPU frequency
1338 MHz
1.442 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.7126 TFLOPS
-
Shading units
128
6
Execution units
5
2.0
OpenCL version
-
1.3
Vulkan version
-
2960 x 1440
Max display resolution
2732 x 2048
Connectivity
Up to 4700 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7500 Mbps
LTE Cat. 21
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.0
6
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Memory Specifications
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR4X
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
1x 320MP
Max camera resolution
-
UFS 3.1
Storage type
NVMe
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
6 W
TDP
6 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.5-A
MediaTek APU 580
Neural processor (NPU)
Neural Engine
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Dimensity 8200
1229
A15 Bionic
2333
+90%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Dimensity 8200
3892
A15 Bionic
5741
+48%
FP32 (float)
Dimensity 8200
1413
A15 Bionic
1678
+19%
AnTuTu 10
Dimensity 8200
915634
A15 Bionic
1315838
+44%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited
Vivo V30 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
9417
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
6997
3DMark Sling Shot Unlimited
Unihertz 8849 Tank 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
10881
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
8667
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
676
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
3859
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo V27 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6567
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
9445
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1790
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
2960
3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
6519
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
11604
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo iQOO Neo7 SE
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
1751
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Apple A15 Bionic
2590
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/mediatek-dimensity-8200-vs-apple-a15-bionic" target="_blank">MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Apple A15 Bionic</a>