Unisoc T9100
vs
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
vs
SoC Comparison Result
Below are the results of a comparison of
Unisoc T9100
and
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
mobile processors based on key performance characteristics, as well as power consumption and much more.
Advantages
- Newer Launch Date: March 2025 (March 2025 vs December 2022)
- Higher Technology: 4 nm (6 nm vs 4 nm)
- Higher Frequency: 3100 MHz (2700 MHz vs 3100 MHz)
Basic
Unisoc
Label Name
MediaTek
March 2025
Launch Date
December 2022
SmartPhone Mid range
Platform
SmartPhone Flagship
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
T9100
Model Name
MT6896Z
1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A76, 3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76, 4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
8
Cores
8
6 nm
Technology
4 nm
2700 MHz
Frequency
3100 MHz
GPU Specifications
Mali-G57 MP4
GPU name
Mali-G610 MP6
780 MHz
GPU frequency
950 MHz
0.1997 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.442 TFLOPS
32
Shading units
-
-
Execution units
6
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
3440 x 1440
Max display resolution
2960 x 1440
Connectivity
-
Download speed
Up to 4700 Mbps
LTE Cat. 18
4G support
LTE Cat. 21
Yes
5G support
Yes
5.3
Bluetooth
5.3
5
Wi-Fi
6
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Memory Specifications
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR5
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Memory Bus
4x 16 Bit
Miscellaneous
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
-
TDP
6 W
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
MediaTek APU 580
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 Single Core
T9100
900
Dimensity 8200
1229
+37%
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
T9100
2469
Dimensity 8200
3892
+58%
FP32 (float)
T9100
201
Dimensity 8200
1413
+603%
AnTuTu 10
T9100
542568
Dimensity 8200
915634
+69%
Comparison of Devices
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
Unisoc T9100
233
Vivo iQOO Neo7 (Dimensity 8200)
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
676
PCMark for Android Storage 2.0
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
Unisoc T9100
25569
Cubot Max 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
34102
PCMark for Android Work 3.0
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
Unisoc T9100
14289
Oukitel WP200 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
14061
Related SoC Comparisons
Share in social media
Or Link To Us
<a href="https://cputronic.com/soc/compare/unisoc-t9100-vs-mediatek-dimensity-8200" target="_blank">Unisoc T9100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200</a>